wizwor
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2007
- Messages
- 1,075
- Reaction score
- 929
sure you do :hippie:I hate to be part of the ITYS (I Told You So) club. But I told you so,
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.sure you do :hippie:I hate to be part of the ITYS (I Told You So) club. But I told you so,
Lloyd is THAT big of a head case that we can't put up with him for another season?
Per the Patriots, Welker was their #1 target, so they didn't bet on Amendola instead of Welker.
Not to confine this observation just to you, but I always love it when someone asks something like, "we can't put up with him for another season?" when the person asking the question is not one of the "we", or people who will actually have to "put up with him."Lloyd is THAT big of a head case that we can't put up with him for another season? At least he is a WR who caught 70 balls in our system last year
It was three injuries in four years. It is a lot compared to a majority of the players, but not as bad as say Aquib Talib who no one seems to question his ability to say on the field.
Interesting all off season you were stating that you didn't believe a word the Patriots were saying and now you use the same statements to prove your point? Convenient.
You're nipping at the wrong ankles here. The Patriots negotiated with Welker first, and reporters, not just the Patriots, stated that the team's first priority was Welker.
You're nipping at the wrong ankles here. The Patriots negotiated with Welker first, and reporters, not just the Patriots, stated that the team's first priority was Welker.
...and if my aunt had a penis and a pair of testicles, she'd be my uncle.
I took one day for everyone to turn back on the guy who really shouldnt have played the 2nd half on sunday. He is injured.Was injured before the game. ***** happens. Dont know how it is his fault.
And you stated you didn't believe them.
It is getting to the point that this is comical.... I don't believe with the current players injured, that this offense is as good as the 2006 offense.
Ridley: Fumble machine
Vereen: Broke wrist
Blount: Not really that good
Bolden: Ditto Blount
Amendola: Broke d!ck
Thompkins: Not ready for the NFL yet
Boyce: Ditto Thompkins
Sudfeld: Ditto Boyce
Hooman: Really? Counting on him?
Edleman: Only bright spot thus far... seeing as he is still healthy for now.
I will say this... I think Washington has a big game for us but it wouldn't surprise me if he did next to nothing too. (I am feeling rather pessimistic today)
Danny Amendola was officially "limited" in Tuesday's practice.
That's despite the fact that he wasn't spotted at the Patriots' walkthrough. Looking like a game-time decision, at best, for Thursday's showdown with the Jets, Amendola's status is murky beyond Week 2. Julian Edelman, who scored two touchdowns against the Bills Sunday, will man the slot if Amendola can't go.
Not that it means much of anything, per Rotoworld:
I've learned that until the team confirms something you can always take premature reports with a grain of salt. Whether he plays or not will be known when the game day inactives are announced. Until then it's speculation at best.
I feel the same way, supafly.Agreed, but if missing Thursday's game would give him 2 weeks to heal, that may be the better route.
I feel the same way, supafly.
I'd rather he sit this one out and be ready for the 3 week stretch against the Falcons, Bengals, and Saints. That, on paper, looks like the toughest stretch of the season. They're going to need him badly for those battles.