FoxboroFlyer
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,000
- Reaction score
- 2,314
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He hasn't been labelled a fantasy sleeper, Lombardi thinks he may be one.
Patriots use RBBC not a feature back.
It was just a hunch based on what he's seen so far, not inside info.
Nevertheless, it's good that he's been noticed.
Well "according to " means by the afermentioned individual which was Lombardi who DID label Bolden a fantasy sleeper.
Him beeing "noticed" is a huge understatement considering he is outshining 2nd round pick Vereen.
He hasn't been labelled a fantasy sleeper, Lombardi thinks he may be one.
Patriots use RBBC not a feature back.
It was just a hunch based on what he's seen so far, not inside info.
Nevertheless, it's good that he's been noticed.
I'd consider taking Bolden over Larsen.
Is Bolden working on fielding punts or KO's ??
Although it's only preseason, we'll be able to compare Ridley/Vereen/Bolden in game action soon.
the notion of running back by committee is only feasible if a player does not step up for a feature back role.......if bolden provides that, he will be a feature back.
and by feature back, I mean someone who rushes for 1000 yards
Dude hasn't even played in a preseason game yet slow down. Undrafted FA love here is kinda ridiculous sometimes. I really hope he plays well though.
The amount of UDFA love last year wasn't even close to what Bolden and Francis are getting now.
The amount of UDFA love last year wasn't even close to what Bolden and Francis are getting now.
Every summer I question my sexual orientation as I fall in love with a couple Pats UDFAs
the notion of running back by committee is only feasible if a player does not step up for a feature back role.......if bolden provides that, he will be a feature back.
and by feature back, I mean someone who rushes for 1000 yards