Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,293
- Reaction score
- 3,986
The Pats' defense gave up 4 scores, none of them because of being handed poor field position.
Had the offense not built a huge lead, it still would have been at least 4 scores, because the 4th down stop would have been a FG.
The defense did little that resulted in good field position for the offense (e.g., TOs that hand the offense good field position) -- just the Wilfork return to midfield.
The only reason this looked like a decent defensive performance is the red zone. The defense was ineffective on the rest of the field.
It's a good thing that the red zone is such an important part of the field.
Had the offense not built a huge lead, it still would have been at least 4 scores, because the 4th down stop would have been a FG.
The defense did little that resulted in good field position for the offense (e.g., TOs that hand the offense good field position) -- just the Wilfork return to midfield.
The only reason this looked like a decent defensive performance is the red zone. The defense was ineffective on the rest of the field.
It's a good thing that the red zone is such an important part of the field.
Last edited: