- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 13,687
- Reaction score
- 16,178
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments."The best is yet to come'- LoMo
Great. Talk is cheap, so to quote FM radio stations around the US, "Less talk, More (pounding of the) Rock!"
Dear, Lawrence: Run the damn ball North-South with intensity and conviction, not like you're carrying your aunties hummel collection!
....And HOLD ON to that ball, b*tch!
Here's an "If Only" of my own I would like to add...
"IF ONLY we had drafted Maurice Jones-Drew and Greg Jennings instead of Maroney and Chad Jackson." :bricks:
Oh no 6 more carries last year and he would have fallen apart! Thankfully they held him out of the last game, otherwise he'd have evaporated! /sarcasm
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence...
I will once again pose the question, why has BB not attempted to find a "lead" runningback for 5 friggin years? I don't know but maybe, just maybe, BB believes that having 2+ solid RBs to split the load is BETTER for this team.
We have 5 years of evidence. Durability and carries. Come on now.
BB has exhibited an ability to maximize the abilities of his players. If he thinks more value can be gained by limiting a player's snaps, he will do so. See Faulk.
If LoMo showed 2004 Corey Dillon or Antoine Smith circa 2001, he'd get his 200+ carries. LoMo is a 170-190 carry guy. It's not a bad thing. It's what he is.
he has been the leading rusher... im not sure with your expectations were but not all late first round picks turn into all pros the pats got lucky with Logan Mankins, Vince Wilfork, and Brandon Meriweather, most late first round picks end up never being more then just backups
I will once again pose the question, why has BB not attempted to find a "lead" runningback for 5 friggin years? I don't know but maybe, just maybe, BB believes that having 2+ solid RBs to split the load is BETTER for this team.
2011 will be the extreme makeover for the RB core. I'm pretty sure all 5 of the RBs contracts end.
They haven't even ATTEMPTED to make him carry the "full load" like other teams' RBs. Yet you determine that he can't carry 200 times by the simple fact that he hasn't been asked to. It's also very funny that you say this considering that if the last game of the season meant anything last year he was almost guaranteed to have gotten to that arbitrary magical number of 200.
Your should focus on your last sentence a little more. It IS what it IS, and whether Maroney could consistently carry 200+ times a season is UNKNOWN because he has never really been asked to. He averages 13 carries a game in his career (which has nothing to do with durability) which would make 208 if he played 16 games. That is barely on pace for that 200 mark, and it is NOT a "durability" thing. It's how they CHOOSE to use their RBs.
PS: It's been 4 years not 5
Maroney won't be able to "command" money. He will be signed by a team to be Chester Taylor, Faulk, Bradshaw, etc.
The guy had 194 attempts last season... not much different than 200. He didn't come close to 1000yrds. That is not very good production.
In 2007, running he had 185 in the most prolific passing offense in the history of the league, and he still only manged a pedestrian 835 (4.5ypc is inflated because the LBS and DBs had to respect the pass and play further off the LOS).
The 1,000 yard fixation is an anachronism, and really shouldn't matter so much to people. It's an arbitrary number, and it says nothing. Pierre Thomas didn't get 1,000 yards, is not any good either?
Chester Taylor is plenty capable of commanding money. He's a good RB... kinda like Maroney. That's why he's able to get 3+ million per year, which is pretty good RB money. It's more than Maroney makes right now.
The 1,000 yard fixation is an anachronism, and really shouldn't matter so much to people. It's an arbitrary number, and it says nothing. Pierre Thomas didn't get 1,000 yards, is not any good either?
The guy had 194 attempts last season... not much different than 200. He didn't come close to 1000yrds. That is not very good production.
In 2007, he had 185 in the most prolific passing offense in the history of the league, and he still only manged a pedestrian 835 (4.5ypc is inflated because the LBS and DBs had to respect the pass and play further off the LOS).
Taylor is a 3rd down back who got 40+ catches the last two seasons.
The difference between Pierre Thomas and Maroney?
Maroney 3.9ypc= average to below average
Pierre Thomas 5.4ypc= game changing
only 1.5ypc difference.
Barring injury is THE factor this year for LoMo....has been hurt every year since he has been in this league