- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,709
- Reaction score
- 24,312
yeah, what have today's draft picks done in the league, you idiot?
*ROFLMOA* Thank you EOM. I am glad you said it..
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.yeah, what have today's draft picks done in the league, you idiot?
Wotan - Please. You are wrong on TBC. TBC wasn't let go. His contract was up and he wanted to see what other teams were offering.
Fine, following the '05 season. You get the point.BTW, you should really read what is said instead of showing that you don't. You'd sound less like D-Money and more like someone that might offer up something worth reading.
And no, you didn't hear the same argument in 2005 because the situation isn't even remotely similar.
Yeah, like Chad Jackson was suppose to be the saviour.yeah, what have today's draft picks doned in the league, you idiot?
Yeah, like Chad Jackson was suppose to be the saviour.
Yeah, like Chad Jackson was suppose to be the saviour.
Fine, following the '05 season. You get the point.
Chung is a stud,at least they thought about that position.
That issue was more caused by the Branch hold out which may not have been forseeable during the draft. Anyway, let's give it some time, fellers. Clearly the Pats understand their LB situation better than we do and they know if they have better options than what they passed on today.
Yeah, he actually was according to many.
You're playing to semantics here. Tully was offered a contract that was worth more than his role-playing status with the Pats. If the Pats thought he was worth keeping as a FT player, they would have resigned him or extended him.
Fine, following the '05 season. You get the point.
And the other ridiculous premise was that Ben Watson could play WR because of his 4.45 combine time and had chased down Champ to prevent the TD.
No. I am not playing with semantics. I am dealing with hard facts. People yelled and screamed about Branch and Givens going and whining about the fact that the Patriots didn't re-sign or extend either one of them. What happened? It turned out that the Pats had TRIED to re-sign them on several occasions and they turned the Pats down. What makes you think the same thing didn't happen with TBC?
What the hell are you talking about?Again, it wasn't following the 2005 season. The situation was different. Totally and completely. Trying to say otherwise is lying through your teeth. I really don't want to re-hash things but we can if you really need to hear it again.
Yes. It was so ridiculous that in 2006, that's where he was used quite a bit during the 1st 6 games. In the slot. As a WR.
Michael Johnson says hi.
Seymour had 8 sacks, thats not all that great.All i know is that when this team cant get a damn pass rush next year, dont complain!!!