It isn't a major rebuilding effort. If there is an uncapped year, the Pats will have 13 RFA next year including Gostkowski, Hobbs, Kazcur, and Mankins. The Pats can easily retain those guys with the cap room they have. Without the uncapped year, Hobbs and Mankins become free agents, but the Pats will have plenty of room to sign both along with either Wilfork or Seymour (maybe both) and Neal.
The Pats will be fine. They will have something like $80-90 million to sign free agents next year. If the Pats had only 30 guys on the roster and only $20 million in cap room, then I would be worried.
IF, PATs mange to get all players back they want. No problem.
But there will be other teams interested in many of these players.
Of the 30+ players suppose 15 take better offers from other teams.
Still no problem you say because we have LOTs of money to get other
players.
What about the NEW players obtained to replace those that take better
offers?
Will they be as good in PATs system?
What effect will they have on team chemistry that the PATs now enjoy.
Lots of uncertainty here.
So now you are Pioli. Your reputation is A++. You can land a big deal
with many teams.
Will you risk your reputation on a major change in the roster and the possibility the PATs don't do as well with potentially many the new players which may have a negative impact on your reputation
OR
do you strike while the iron is hot, and get that big contract?
I know some will say even if PATs don't do as well it won't hurt his
reputation. Who really knows. At least in negotiations a potential
buyer might bring it up in an attempt to get a better deal.
Can anyone really say Scott did not at least consider this?
Remember you are dealing with a man who is use to considering all
moves and the effects in the future.