- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 35,696
- Reaction score
- 7,798
Or on 2nd and long :
Warren, Wilfork and Seymour on the DL, of course.
With a LB group of :
Lawson, Vrabel, Bruschi, Colvin at LB. For the love of God, I can't even imagine that. As much as I don't like trading up, if we could trade a #3 to get to 16 or so, or even better 15 so we could sign Lawson to an extra year, I would do it. The only downside is I'd hear Tanguay and ****erson talking about Manny and think they were talking about the Patriots only to find out they are talking about the other Manny.
Seriously, draft a TJ clone later so that on early downs we could have Vrabel, draftee, Bruschi, Colvin then on passing downs have that sick group above.
The extra bonuses are :
- Lawson has the growth potential to get to 260+ and be the next McGinest.
- Lawson blocked 6 kicks in college.
- Drafting a TJ clone would get Bruschi back to his old ILB position and be more of a playmaker.
Warren, Wilfork and Seymour on the DL, of course.
With a LB group of :
Lawson, Vrabel, Bruschi, Colvin at LB. For the love of God, I can't even imagine that. As much as I don't like trading up, if we could trade a #3 to get to 16 or so, or even better 15 so we could sign Lawson to an extra year, I would do it. The only downside is I'd hear Tanguay and ****erson talking about Manny and think they were talking about the Patriots only to find out they are talking about the other Manny.
Seriously, draft a TJ clone later so that on early downs we could have Vrabel, draftee, Bruschi, Colvin then on passing downs have that sick group above.
The extra bonuses are :
- Lawson has the growth potential to get to 260+ and be the next McGinest.
- Lawson blocked 6 kicks in college.
- Drafting a TJ clone would get Bruschi back to his old ILB position and be more of a playmaker.
Last edited: