sb1
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 34,794
- Reaction score
- 39,128
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.if i were a voter, i would look at the career stats and achievements before the alleged steroid use took place...then determine if they are worthy. Bonds (before steroids)was one of the best all around 5 tool players ever to play the game. Clemens (before steroids) was one of the best power pitcher of his or any other generation. Papi, in my opinion, was THE MOST CLUTCH player in baseball history. **** Shaughnessy. He has always been a hack and has a high opinion of himself. The epitome of Boston Media
The CHB, has done this for a couple of years now, and many of the players he could have voted for had no suspect history. Hes just and arrogant, condecending, azzhole who needs his vote taken away from him.He was merely being consistent with not voting for steroid users... Perhaps in Ortiz' case Shank's not voting for him is a one-time thing that might also have to do with his being mostly a DH...If that's true then I respect his position and in fact heartily agree with him...The other 5 glob-holes on the other hand who voted for Bonds & Clemens can GFT...