Did you hit your head on something hard and cant read ?
How is your little anectode about Gronk relevant to your claim that past accomplishments are irrelevant for BB ?
Because this is what the entire back and forth is about. Not Gronk. Not Anything else.
Lets try a last time.
P. S. Gronk was a key cog last year without whom we would have not gone past the AFCCG. But since you reduce him down to his receiving which was never as important as the uncertainty he brought onto opponents in terms of run/pass I am not surprised.
Just FYI we are not talking about fantasy football so the stats you mention don't really mean much without looking at the big picture which is everything else he brought to the table.
Belichick was willing to trade Gronk after the 2017 season, prior to the 2018 draft because he knew he was on the decline.
He wasn’t going to keep him for his prior performance, because he was on the decline.
Only Belichick knew Gronk was on the decline after 2017. None of us would have been happy to hear they traded Gronk for a 1st round pick because we did not see the decline in 2017.
Belichick also did not give Gronk a raise. He only gave him added incentives that he could not meet in 2018.
There were plenty of people & MSM who wanted Belichick to tear up his contract and give him a raise.
I admit I was not happy when I heard Belichick was going to trade Gonk for a 1st round pick.
Yes he was important in the playoffs & he made the key catch in the Super Bowl.
Too be honest.... Gronk was my favorite Patriot of all time.
You never answered my question....
Do you think Gronk 2018, was as good as Gronk 2017?
All I am saying is I am glad Belichick is running the team, instead of the MSM & the Patsfans members.
None of us or the MSM would have supported Gronk for a 1st round pick, but it would have
Been the right move for the team in the long run.
