Demaryius Thomas cut

varjao said:

Man if Harry goes to IR I'm ready to stick a fork on this pick right now and move on. God damn it's the first time BB get a 1st rounder WR and the guy gets injured in his first catch in a game.

Come on

Click to expand...

I would feel horrible for him and it could stunt his development. But your post is nonsense.

signbabybrady said:

I'm sure there are other examples but other than Flowers I can't recall a lot of rookies who got IR'ed their first year who wind up contributing much here. This would be a very bad thing he needs to be developing not riding the tub.

Click to expand...

Ben Watson.

Hopefully Isaiah Wynn will be another example.

Man if Nkeal goes to IR, ill be extremely bummed out, way more than possibly losing Thomes

Ice_Ice_Brady said:

Click to expand...

Download GIF Keyboard. It will change your life.

Todd Bradley said:

Well...we’re waiting....





I’d post the gif but I have no idea how.

Click to expand...

Reiss doesn't know anything regarding Harry. So anyone saying anything definitively is merely speculating

JMC00 said:

Reiss doesn't know anything regarding Harry. So anyone saying anything definitively is merely speculating

Click to expand...

Doesn't seem like anyone is saying he is. Just some people trying to connect dots.

You m ay be sure, but I don't think that there were any non-first rounders. Watson did miss most of his rookie year, as did Wynn.

signbabybrady said:

I'm sure there are other examples but other than Flowers I can't recall a lot of rookies who got IR'ed their first year who wind up contributing much here. This would be a very bad thing he needs to be developing not riding the tub.

Click to expand...

They are either:
Trading Dorsett
Waiving GO
Waiving JM
(with hopes they make it to the PS)
IRing Harry
Passing on DT (which I think is doubtful)

I cant see them carrying 8 WRs including slater. It would be unprecedented. 7 is a lot since they only usually dress 4 a game.

Someone is going somewhere...

Bruins29 said:

They are either:
Trading Dorsett
Waiving GO
Waiving JM
(with hopes they make it to the PS)
IRing Harry
Passing on DT (which I think is doubtful)

I cant see them carrying 8 WRs including slater. It would be unprecedented. 7 is a lot since they only usually dress 4 a game.

Someone is going somewhere...

Click to expand...

I can't see them waiving JM.

So do I have this right? If they Waive Gunner or Meyers, they have to pass through waivers to get to the PS. If another team claims either, that player has to be on its 53?

50-yard-line said:

So do I have this right? If they Waive Gunner or Meyers, they have to pass through waivers to get to the PS. If another team claims either, that player has to be on its 53?

Click to expand...

yes

Just saying Olszewski was going to be cut yesterday. Maybe Bill kept him on the 53 so he wasn't subject to the initial 53 cut down waiver claim and practice squads being filled. Now with that period over it might be easier to get him to the PS.

Bruins29 said:

They are either:
Trading Dorsett
Waiving GO
Waiving JM
(with hopes they make it to the PS)
IRing Harry
Passing on DT (which I think is doubtful)

I cant see them carrying 8 WRs including slater. It would be unprecedented. 7 is a lot since they only usually dress 4 a game.

Someone is going somewhere...

Click to expand...

They are crazy if they waive Dorsett or Meyers. Both guys are very inexpensive and were great this offseason (Meyers without Brady, Dorsett with Brady.) Waiving Gunner, IRing Harry, or passing on DT are the likely options here, and I've been doubling down on the third. By the way, Torrey Smith was just released; not that he is some great WR, but my point is that proven veteran WRs past their prime are not like a unicorn...they tend to be available pretty often.

Yes, I believe that the player has been on the 53 for 3 weeks; someone will check.

50-yard-line said:

So do I have this right? If they Waive Gunner or Meyers, they have to pass through waivers to get to the PS. If another team claims either, that player has to be on its 53?

Click to expand...

Ice_Ice_Brady said:

They are crazy if they waive Dorsett or Meyers. Both guys are very inexpensive and were great this offseason (Meyers without Brady, Dorsett with Brady.) Waiving Gunner, IRing Harry, or passing on DT are the likely options here, and I've been doubling down on the third. By the way, Torrey Smith was just released; not that he is some great WR, but my point is that proven veteran WRs past their prime are not like a unicorn...they tend to be available pretty often.

Click to expand...

Agree. BTW They would release Dorsett. He does not go though waivers. He would be a UFA. I think that is doubtful since he has trade value anyway.

JMC00 said:

Just saying Olszewski was going to be cut yesterday. Maybe Bill kept him on the 53 so he wasn't subject to the initial 53 cut down waiver claim and practice squads being filled. Now with that period over it might be easier to get him to the PS.

Click to expand...

I dont agree with this at all

Not all teams have the capability of gathering 53 worthwile players like us. Now that he made the 53 bc BB was afraid to lose him (reportedly), he is in even more evidence after sticking on the roster, especially after being cut and brought back.

He needs to stay in for a long time for the heat to get over, IMO

varjao said:

Man if Harry goes to IR I'm ready to stick a fork on this pick right now and move on. God damn it's the first time BB get a 1st rounder WR and the guy gets injured in his first catch in a game.

Come on

Click to expand...

May I suggest switching to decaf?

realtime said:

Ben Watson.

Hopefully Isaiah Wynn will be another example.

Click to expand...

Wynn is a good bet. And then we go back to 03. I'm sure there are still other examples too. But let's not add Harry to this group please.

mgteich said:

You m ay be sure, but I don't think that there were any non-first rounders. Watson did miss most of his rookie year, as did Wynn.

Click to expand...

I don't get what you are saying?