Here's a hypothetical (of course) question:
Imagine that you did not trade 32 & 103 for Terry Glenn 2.0; after all, you've had the healthiest and most productive season from your WRs since 2004. Why would you give away your first-rounder for a small diva who is under cost control for only 2 more seasons?
Imagine also that you did not trade 137 for TE Dwayne Allen & 200. You obviously had the James O'Shaunessy trade in your back pocket, so there was no need to acquire an overpaid underachiever from the Indy Clots organization with all of its bad habits.
Imagine also that you did not trade 72 & 96 (& 200, which you no longer have anyway) for 83 & 85.
Imagine also that you did not sign Mike Gillislee to an offer sheet (for only 2 years), and therefore still have 163 at your disposal.
Imagine also that you did not throw away your own 5th-rounder (#175) for one year of the legendary Barkevious Mingo.
Imagine also that you did not throw away your 7th-rounder for the lumbering TE / OT / Whatever Mike Williams, who now sucks at 2 positions.
Imagine therefore that you control the following draft picks:
32
72
96
103
137
163
175
216
239
250
Now imagine that at 32 you selected OT Ryan Ramczyk; if the medicals scare you, then by all means select Dion Dawkins instead of Ramczyk (I would have no problem, at all, should you choose to do so). I would prefer the athletic, long-armed, 4-position, starter-calibre versatility of Dawkins to the possibility that Cam Robinson will be limited athletically to RT and that Forrest Lamp will be limited by his short arms to Guard.
Next imagine that at 72 you selected DE Jordan Willis, merely the Best Player Available Regardless of Position.
Next imagine that you are at 96. You've noticed that 5 out of the last 6 picks have been used for DBs. You don't want to be left out of the DB market, so you decide that you will use this pick on one of the following:
Cordrea Tankersley
Rasul Douglas
Howard Wilson
Desmond King
The question is: Which of these 4 do you choose?