Garbanza
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 2,199
- Reaction score
- 1
Re: Why isn’t anyone talking about Maroney’s fumble?
Interesting thoughts from an intelligent gentleman with a questionable sense of humor. I especially enjoy the way you attack my intelligence and character. Lord knows that a messageboard is a great way to meet and judge people (eye roll). Lighten up, Alice!
I do not like Maroney's skills set at RB, obviously....but there's nothing knee-jerk about my reaction. I've been singing this song for a while now. I do find your over-the-top defense of Maroney curious...and I have come to my own conclusions about that.
Anyway, that fumble of his was awful and untimely....but as I had stated in another thread, that's not why we lost. Although - gosh, it would be nice to have a decent running game in order to keep the defenses honest. I mean, if that fourth and 2 call meant that BB does not trust the defense (which I do not agree with) than I suspect that the 3-2 call meant he does not trust the running game. Just sayin'.
Living proof ignorance is indeed bliss, I guess...hahahaha
That's why kneejerks always play the victim card when they can't participate in rational discussion of a topic. People don't disagree with you because they love what you attack, they disagree with you because your contentions are generally ridiculous.
Interesting thoughts from an intelligent gentleman with a questionable sense of humor. I especially enjoy the way you attack my intelligence and character. Lord knows that a messageboard is a great way to meet and judge people (eye roll). Lighten up, Alice!
I do not like Maroney's skills set at RB, obviously....but there's nothing knee-jerk about my reaction. I've been singing this song for a while now. I do find your over-the-top defense of Maroney curious...and I have come to my own conclusions about that.
Anyway, that fumble of his was awful and untimely....but as I had stated in another thread, that's not why we lost. Although - gosh, it would be nice to have a decent running game in order to keep the defenses honest. I mean, if that fourth and 2 call meant that BB does not trust the defense (which I do not agree with) than I suspect that the 3-2 call meant he does not trust the running game. Just sayin'.
Last edited: