Welcome to PatsFans.com

Where do the Pats WR's rank relative to the NFL?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by makewayhomer, Mar 13, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. makewayhomer

    makewayhomer Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Former lurker, now poster. Sorry for another WR thread, but this one is a new topic.

    With all the recent additions to the WR addition, where do the Patriots WR's rank relative to the league? Are they an average unit? Above average? Below?

    Is our 3 WR set better (relative to the NFL) than our 2 receiver set? I think so.

    For the sake of argument, lets use these as our units:

    2 WR's: Stallworth and Caldwell
    3 WR's: Stallworth, Caldwell, and Welker
    4 WR's: Stallworth, Caldwell, Welker, and Gaffney

    I think the most important of the above are the 2/3 WR sets, just b/c we don't figure to go 4 wide very often.
     
  2. danny88

    danny88 Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Messages:
    1,998
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Washington is going to be a good player
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2007
  3. Boston Boxer

    Boston Boxer U.S. Air Force Retired PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,487
    Likes Received:
    22
    Ratings:
    +66 / 5 / -1

    #75 Jersey

    i say they are an average unit...alot better than last year, but still average as a whole
     
  4. Bobs My Uncle

    Bobs My Uncle PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2005
    Messages:
    2,440
    Likes Received:
    34
    Ratings:
    +103 / 9 / -2

    #12 Jersey

    Ditto for me as well.
     
  5. 37Harrison

    37Harrison 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,624
    Likes Received:
    19
    Ratings:
    +46 / 1 / -2

    #37 Jersey


    yep, just average.
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2007
  6. VJCPatriot

    VJCPatriot Pro Bowl Player

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    12,383
    Likes Received:
    30
    Ratings:
    +56 / 1 / -4

    Dunno about just average. Stallworth is an excellent deep threat. I think how well Stallworth works out for us will go a long way to determining how good this unit is. Also if Washington can step up he could claim a starting job. And Wes Welker is a great underneath option imo. The Pats for the first time are going to be able to work a lot of mismatches, deep, underneath, and middle range. I expect to see a completely different unit on the field next season. And with Brady pulling the trigger, I can easily see 4,000 yards and 30+ TDs from Tommy in 2007.
     
  7. pciamp24

    pciamp24 Practice Squad Player

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2006
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think that this group could be above average and one of the better groups in the NFL if healthy.

    That is a big IF!
     
  8. borg

    borg In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    4,157
    Likes Received:
    135
    Ratings:
    +347 / 19 / -20

    The way that Brady spreads the seed around....
     
  9. PatsFanSince74

    PatsFanSince74 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    10,030
    Likes Received:
    68
    Ratings:
    +174 / 3 / -1

    measured by what? receptions? yards gained? TD's? big game impact? spreading the field to open up the running game to succeed? I don't think you can rank this group since (a) it's never played together and (b) some of its main components have never played with TB. We don't know how Stallworth and Brady will click on the field. If the pieces all fit together and work together really well, it could be the best unit in the NFL. If they don't or if people start to complain that they're not seeing enough balls, then this time next year we'll see a dozen threads like "What were they thinking?" It's hard to think of Jerry Rice without thinking of Joe Montana. Rice was great, but he was the greatest because of how he worked with Joe.
     
  10. Coog548

    Coog548 On the Roster

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 1 / -0

    Not one single reciever will put up HUGE numbers. I think they will do alot better than last year but i don't even know if Washington will even make the team. He sign a small contract and i believe will be gone before the season starts.
     
  11. Fixit

    Fixit In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    4,776
    Likes Received:
    39
    Ratings:
    +188 / 3 / -2

    As a unit, top to bottom, better than average.
     
  12. patchick

    patchick Moderatrix Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    11,801
    Likes Received:
    414
    Ratings:
    +1,134 / 9 / -2

    #11 Jersey

    Right now, Caldwell's the one and only receiver who has a full season of experience playing with Brady in the Patriots' system. Given that, I think I'll predict that the WR corps will be worse than average for the first handful of games, but better than average by the end of the season.
     
  13. patriotsdynasty12189

    patriotsdynasty12189 Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    966
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    If you want depth, we probably have the best with all our WR could be average starters. Most teams have 2 or 3 good to great WR while we have 6 average receivers and one good WR.
     
  14. Fixit

    Fixit In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Messages:
    4,776
    Likes Received:
    39
    Ratings:
    +188 / 3 / -2

    Most teams have 2 or 3 good to great receivers? I beg to differ.
     
  15. makewayhomer

    makewayhomer Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    this is the best tandems in the league, as ranked by DPAR. I don't know if you guys visit footballoutsiders.com but they do some awesome stuff there. it's basically SABR metrics for football. Now, this analysis is much newer for football than it is for baseball, so you need to take some stuff with a grain of salt.

    maybe I'll start another thread to discuss their work. anywho, here is their list of teams with 2 WR's who were each top 30 last year


    11-L.Fitzgerald ARI 7
    81-A.Boldin ARI 21

    84-T.Houshmandzadeh CIN 4
    85-C.Johnson CIN 5

    81-T.Owens DAL 8
    83-T.Glenn DAL 9

    11-Ro.Williams DET 6
    87-M.Furrey DET 10

    87-R.Wayne IND 1
    88-M.Harrison IND 2

    12-M.Colston NO 11
    19-D.Henderson NO 17
    87-J.Horn NO 18

    10-S.Holmes PIT 19
    86-H.Ward PIT 30

    18-D.Hackett SEA 15
    82-D.Jackson SEA 24

    80-I.Bruce STL 12
    83-K.Curtis STL 29

    that's 9 teams
     
  16. T-ShirtDynasty

    T-ShirtDynasty Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    3,562
    Likes Received:
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0 / -0

    Pulling out DPAR on your second post? Ahhhh.... the force is strong with this one. ;) Welcome to the board.
     
  17. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    41,974
    Likes Received:
    198
    Ratings:
    +428 / 12 / -26

    So is our trio in the top 10?? They are pretty close on paper, but difficult to tell without performance numbers with this QB and in this system, Kelly Washington may be a very good fine. His height and ability to go over the middle may be beneficial.
     
  18. makewayhomer

    makewayhomer Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,030
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I don't think our unit is top 10.

    I think our 2 WR set is just about average. Remember Caldwell was JAG on the Chargers, who themselves don't have great WR's. Stallworth is very good, probably a top 25 WR.



    keep in mind I am ignoring Brady in all of this, and assuming that all NFL teams have the same robot QB.
     
  19. TealSox

    TealSox Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Pats WR corp 2007: deep with average talent and significant upside.

    Pats WR corp 2006: Lacks depth, bellow average talent with very little upside. (since Branch left, despite drafting Jackson).

    Compare with the Colts, I think the Pats have a deeper corp with more talent. If I had to measure their top two with the Pats top two, it wouldn't be favorable to the Patriots. I would toss a ton of teams out there who I think have a better WR corp such as Seattle, Arizona, St. Louis and Cincy. But then there are teams like San Fran, San Diego, Baltimore, Philly and Tampa that the Patriots would measure favorably against.

    In the end, this group matches the offense. And that is all you really need. Especially when your playing the Broncos and they have two pro bowl corners, you just toss in four wide receivers.
     
  20. Krazy Koz

    Krazy Koz On the Game Day Roster

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    Messages:
    256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    Would you mind explaining what the numbers mean to some extent. From someone on the outside, it seems like you just listed 9 groups of player/team with some numbers on the end with no perameters or other information to form our own opinion. It sounds like this info could be helpful. thanks for posting.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>