New England Seahawks
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
- Messages
- 142
- Reaction score
- 0
Lmao ... seek professional help.
Would you believe me if I told you I work in the psychology profession?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Lmao ... seek professional help.
Would you believe me if I told you I work in the psychology profession?
TBH, under Pete Carroll that probably won't happen. It's just kinda one of those things that you live with as long as he's coach, and we Pats fans can attest to that.
Honestly, I think that the Seahawks have a better D than anyone that we've faced so far, so I am worried about this game. I could see it being eerily similar to the Cardinals game, if things go badly. ie - I don't expect the Seahawks to have many long, sustained drives against us, but I could see your D creating turnovers and capitalizing. The Patriots really need to hold on to the ball, and so far this season that's uncharacteristically been a problem for them.
Best case scenario, the Pats score 3 touchdowns in the first half and put Seattle in a hole that it can't climb out of. More likely scenario is that it's close throughout.
Really? We've had 3 turnovers so far. If we keep up that pace, we'd have about 10 in the whole season. I don't know, doesn't look like a problem to me.
TBH, under Pete Carroll that probably won't happen. It's just kinda one of those things that you live with as long as he's coach, and we Pats fans can attest to that.
Honestly, I think that the Seahawks have a better D than anyone that we've faced so far, so I am worried about this game. I could see it being eerily similar to the Cardinals game, if things go badly. ie - I don't expect the Seahawks to have many long, sustained drives against us, but I could see your D creating turnovers and capitalizing. The Patriots really need to hold on to the ball, and so far this season that's uncharacteristically been a problem for them.
Best case scenario, the Pats score 3 touchdowns in the first half and put Seattle in a hole that it can't climb out of. More likely scenario is that it's close throughout.
You'd better re-check your data, because they've put 6 on the carpet.
We are not built for that kind of a game. Getting in trouble early would not be good for us. Fortunatly we are not the type of team to get down early.
Although many of us fans would like to see them let Russ off his leash a bit and just play. They have IMHO been hampering him with playcalling untill this last week in against the Panthers.
I don't want an early pats lead to make that be the thing to do it though.
Fumbles that the Patriots recover don't count as turnovers. They've fumbled 6 times and recovered 3 of those. Actually, my mistake was forgetting about the interception Brady threw against the Cardinals, so they have 4 total turnovers, the second lowest amount in the league.
The Patriots really need to hold on to the ball, and so far this season that's uncharacteristically been a problem for them.
Your mistake was in equating
directly with turnovers.
The Patriots have lost 3 fumbles, but they've fumbled 6 times.
Fair enough. But I still don't see it as cause for concern, actually. The only one I'm slightly worried about is Ridley, because this is becoming a recurring issue for him. There isn't anything to suggest Gronk and Welker will keep fumbling, as they've never really been prone to that throughout their careers.
The Patriots really need to hold on to the ball, and so far this season that's uncharacteristically been a problem for them.
OK, as I promised earlier today -- here is a scouting report of the Seahawks Offense. Fair warning, this one’s a bit extensive....
Thank you Hawkscanner for your write-up on the Seahawks offensive players......That being said,here at patsfans we don't go into hyperbole,much......So, your descriptions of "Quake","Hulk" and "Terminator" and other pubescent descriptions,don't exactly register as "fear factors" to our football sophisticates(sic).
We're very familiar with Marshawn Lynch,Sidney Rice,Braylon Edwards and Zach Miller,etc.
You'll have to excuse me,if I'm not exactly quaking in my boots over Seattle's offensive "prowess".....Led by Russell Wilson and his college completion percentage of 72.8%.
After pretty much handling Chris Johnson,Cj Spiller,Ray Rice and other AFC runningbacks,recently........The thought of losing sleep over Marshawn Lynch and your earthshaking fullback is not high on my list of worries this weekend.Stephen Ridley doesn't have an impressive resume,nor does Bolden,Vereen or Woodhead.Taken as an aggregate,though.......With THIS QB....You had better take note of the Patriots running game.
As to your 5'10and 7/8 in(don't forget the 7/8!!!),who can sling the ball 50yds!.....with a flick of his wrist!!!......I'll still take Manning or Flacco or the old,creaky veteran that we are stuck with.
As to Sidney Rice,Braylon Edwards and Golden Tate....A cadre or receivers,who never met a "drop",that they didn't like.......I believe I'll stick with little welker,gronkowski and hernandez in wheelchairs and all those short little passes that our rag-armed quaterback,throws.
Somehow,we'll make out with these players and coaches,who though not as "pumped and jacked",as the seahawks are......I have a feeling that we will muddle through.....But thanks for playing:singing:
Except GB, they haven't faced one offense ranked in the top 2/3rds of the league. Between Arizona, Carolina, and Dallas, they have played some pretty bad offenses. They played well against GB, but they really need to prove that wasn't more than a fluke.
Also they only beat GB because of a blown call in the EZ.
Well, fortunately for us, the NFL doesn't adjust game scores based on what "everyone in the world" thinks.