SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.could Matthews be a safety????hmmmmmmmm
I like Clay Matthews at #34 maybe even ahead of yes Connor!
He looks very fluid. I could see him taking over Bruschi's role.
But was his maternal grandfather a big man, or a feisty Welker type? Was the weight gain steady and gradual or did he just suddenly pack it on?Matthews has a very good upside.He is smart, loves football, very coachable, and a team first guy. I see all this talk about the kid adding pounds over the past 5 years as if that's a red flag. I look at it as someone who was late growing into his body. He was way too thin for his height entering college. Some have inplied roids (strickly unfounded rumors) but I don't think so.
And we do have some evidence of his genes with his father and uncle being big men. So to me his is a legit target at #23. And I look at him as a Tedy replacement more than an OLB. Put him in a rotation for a year of Tedy, Guyton, and Mayo and I look at that position as solid.
But he may prove to be a guy who is more natural at OLB but could play ILB if neeeded.
There are several players that we can take at OLB, depending on how the draft falls. And we can move up a couple of places to take Barwin, English, or Sintim if we need to. Kruger should be there in the mid to late 2nd round.
I like Clay Matthews at #34 maybe even ahead of yes Connor!
He looks very fluid. I could see him taking over Bruschi's role.