PatsFan24
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2005
- Messages
- 4,459
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Speaking of which - while I know reading Tomase is taboo, but did you see the column where Zolak reminisces about he and Troy Brown tormenting Canty in practices after he was drafted?
Zolak kept torching Canty with passes to Brown, to the point where Pete Carroll took them aside and asked them not to pick on him so much as they were destroying his confidence...
I don't think it would have mattered... we pretty much knew that was a bogus 1st round pick when it was made.
to injury/retirement etc etc
Id have to say Mike Vrabel
thoughts?
ok moss? are you kidding?Vrabel? Really? Serious?
My list:
1. Brady
2. Wilfork
3. Moss
Those are the only three guys on the team, IMO, who I think you can make an argument are indispensable. Maybe Mankins and Welker, or Seymour if he's 100%, but I think those 3 cover it for the most part.
ok moss? are you kidding?
I love Wilfork, and other than Brady I agree him and Vrabel are 1/2
Brady aside. There are countless games (big games) that the Pats would certainly not have won had Kevin Faulk not come through in the clutch. On third or forth when they absolutely need the 1st, i'd be peeing my pants quite a bit more if they didn't have Faulk.