Silver Blue&Red
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2010
- Messages
- 6,983
- Reaction score
- 4,905
Finally, some sanity from you whining ****ies.
Enjoy your win*
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Finally, some sanity from you whining ****ies.
So there was a determination that, in essence, uncatchability, that the ball was intercepted at or about the same time the primary contact against the receiver occurred.
That's an outright lie...the .gif doesn't lie. He's lying and he KNOWS he's lying. Someone must have his back for him to say this or he would have just let the league office make the determination later this week. It wouldn't change the outcome, so why is he lying? the ball isn't even in the picture at the start? he's a liar...why?
Finally, some sanity from you whining ****ies.
I know 99% here believe it was the wrong call. I don't blame you guys either. But I have a question.
I saw a game a couple years ago on fox. Can't remember the teams. Similar situation happened, albeit not t the end of the game. Either way...the wr was completely mugged in the end of the end zone while the ball was in the air. However, there was an additional db who tipped the ball maybe 5 yards in front. Flag was thrown and then picked up. They brought in mike pereira to clarify and said it's not possible to have pass interference no matter what IF the ball is tipped prior, despite how much contact there is to the intended wr.
Is this similar or a different situation? I'm assuming tipped and int are virtually the same thing. Just curious if that's irrelevant or not.
I know 99% here believe it was the wrong call. I don't blame you guys either. But I have a question.
I saw a game a couple years ago on fox. Can't remember the teams. Similar situation happened, albeit not t the end of the game. Either way...the wr was completely mugged in the end of the end zone while the ball was in the air. However, there was an additional db who tipped the ball maybe 5 yards in front. Flag was thrown and then picked up. They brought in mike pereira to clarify and said it's not possible to have pass interference no matter what IF the ball is tipped prior, despite how much contact there is to the intended wr.
Is this similar or a different situation? I'm assuming tipped and int are virtually the same thing. Just curious if that's irrelevant or not.
Attaboy to Kenbrell Thompkins. Healthy scratch against Steelers and comes back and makes two good catches on the only two times he was targeted.
and that same interceptor actually bumped into Gronk on the way to making the INT.
Jeff Howe @jeffphowe 2m
Defensive pass interference would have put the Pats on the 1, where they've scored TDs on just 5 of 17 plays this season.
Jeff Howe @jeffphowe 49s
The Patriots' 29.4 TD percentage on plays from the 1 is the fourth worst in the NFL this season.
Finally, some sanity from you whining ****ies.
Jeff Howe @jeffphowe 2m
Defensive pass interference would have put the Pats on the 1, where they've scored TDs on just 5 of 17 plays this season.
Jeff Howe @jeffphowe 49s
The Patriots' 29.4 TD percentage on plays from the 1 is the fourth worst in the NFL this season.
A tipped ball makes all the difference in the world. In this case, however, the ball was not tipped prior to the illegal contact. As a matter of fact, the illegal contact was initiated prior to the eventual interceptor even getting to the other side of Gronk, and that same interceptor actually bumped into Gronk on the way to making the INT.
Game plan for the Donkeys:
Just bear hug all their receivers every single play
No foul.....right?