Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 63,761
- Reaction score
- 14,113
Belichick doesn't draft lb in 1st round never have never will(mayo). Belichick doesn't value guards enough to draft one early(mankins). Belichick doesn't deal with divas(dillon,moss). Belichick won't draft pass rushers early(chandler). Patriots don't spend big money on FA won't happen(Thomas). Your reasoning is bad, bb wants to give ocho another chance but doesn't want to pay him big again. That doesn't make him a lock. Branch vastly out performed him but people act like he's a scrub. again I would love to see ocho succeed here. But your reasoning is severely flawed. Just because he hasn't done it before doesn't mean he wont. It's belichick, anything is possible.
Not to mention the argument is a strawman.
Players who restructure their contracts, get money shifted to bonus to lower the salary, and the cap hit, and make the cap impact of cutting them higher.
You don't do that with someone who may not make the team, so sure, we probably never have restructured a player in the off-season and then cut him. Not because of some silly idea that you want to send a message, but because it was done strategically, and intelligently.
85 is not an example of this. 85 had his pay cut. It was take a pay cut(not a restructure) or be cut. We were willing to let him go.
There are no examples of the past to base this on, because it is uncommon that we give a player a take a cut or be cut ultimatum.
Any past examples being referenced do not apply because they are simply not the same thing.
The contrived reading of tea leaves to create an explanantion of why they weren't cut, while wrong, wouldn't even apply here, because the circumstances are entirely different.