After reading all the shoddy science and inconsistencies in the Wells report and listening to Wells' press conference, I am confused as to the "preponderance of evidence" in this case.
When asked about the evidence during the press conference:
Mark Daniels @MarkDanielsPJ ·
19h 19 hours ago
Wells keeps going back to McNally calling himself the deflator. "It is direct evidence."
Mark Daniels @MarkDanielsPJ ·
19h 19 hours ago
Wells kept talking about McNally calling himself the deflator &saying he would go to ESPN. He didn't reference the 16psi balls in Jets game
Keep in mind these texts were from May! It seems now that Wells built his entire case based on the word "deflator". In doing so, he enriched himself by millions of dollars by creating a lawyer-speak report based on his personal assumptions and beliefs, inconsistencies, and poor science.
Is there any other hard evidence in this case?