Sooo....what happens if Brandon Lloyd or Wes Welker goes down?

Discussion in ' - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Brady_to_Moss, Sep 1, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brady_to_Moss

    Brady_to_Moss Butler Island is here Supporter

    #95 Jersey

    Who will take their place? We really have no one behind them besides Edelman and Slater
  2. Bobs My Uncle

    Bobs My Uncle Supporter Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    Next man up .... just like all the other roster positions that aren't manned by stud backups.
  3. The Scrizz

    The Scrizz 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    #11 Jersey

    Resign Branch or Gaffney (or both).
  4. Sciz

    Sciz Supporter Supporter

    Branch and Gaffney make a lot of sense. Don't rule out a trade with the Rams or something like that.
  5. Brady_to_Moss

    Brady_to_Moss Butler Island is here Supporter

    #95 Jersey

    I can see gaffney coming back after injury
  6. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? Supporter

    No Jersey Selected

    Edelman to the rescue. :rocker:
  7. Bobs My Uncle

    Bobs My Uncle Supporter Supporter

    #12 Jersey

    If Welker is out I'd rather see Edelman out there over Branch. If Lloyd is down it better be someone with an ability to get deep. That's not Branch's game and probably isn't Gaffney's either.
  8. AzPatsFan

    AzPatsFan Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    So we re-sign Branch Gaffney or Stallworth off the Shadow Roster. NBD.
  9. SacPete1

    SacPete1 On the Game Day Roster

    ....generally speaking, I would guess a combination of Edelman and Fells meaning 3 TE's but Hernandez likely playing more slot.
    I'm not just going to blindly say in bill we trust but what appears to be too risky to us has surely been planned for by BB. And I don't think he's done this with the anticipation of getting someone back (Jab) or picking up a cut.
    My 2 cents.
  10. rookBoston

    rookBoston 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    #12 Jersey

    Lots of people are anticipating that Branch and/or Gaffney are on the shadow roster. That may be true, but that shouldn't overshadow the fact that Edelman looked very strong in camp and was the most productive receiver in pre-season play. Critics will make excuses for Gaffney, but Edelman won the #3 job straight up.

    This offense is going to feature Hernandez. A five-wide look will probably include 2 TEs, perhaps with Woodhead or Vereen out wide. And it looks like the Pats will also feature a power running game. I expect they will sign a FA FB off waivers, which Josh obviously wants.

    Sooo... if Lloyd goes down, Slater is our deep threat. If Welker goes down, it's Edelman in the slot doing what he did three years ago.

    I actually feel really good about the roster as it stands. We can spread them out, or line up in the power-I. Depth is good. It's just FB that needs a solution.
  11. rookBoston

    rookBoston 2nd Team Getting Their First Start

    #12 Jersey

    Positional versatility makes the WR situation seem thin. But it's not.

    Woodhead, Vereen, Hernandez, Gronkowski are all exceptional in the passing game. Worst case, we could go five-wide with those four plus a single deep threat, and run a pretty credible offensive set.
  12. xlcjw72

    xlcjw72 Practice Squad Player

    #75 Jersey

    yeah what was Bill thinking we need 5 great receivers and not use gronk and ahern because thats how the nfl work. (sarcasm) We are not the Saints we dont need 3 WR to be good we have arguably two of the best TE in the game, the best slot WR and a very good number 1 WR, add Woodhead out the backfield we will be ok! People forget Edelmen is a very good backup.Branch can come in anytime a-la two years ago. This lineup is stacked! We have to calm down folks! lets get the beers ready and enjoy this season! God i love football!
  13. Creative Username

    Creative Username On the Game Day Roster

    If either of them go down we will unleash our 5 TE set. Hernandez at HB, Fells bunched, Gronk in the slot and Shiancoe outside. And then we get Julian Edelman to play TE (because he plays everything. He's our backup kicker... and Head Coach)... Assuming he's still on the team. I haven't seen our 53 man roster yet.
  14. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks Supporter Supporter

    Edleman played extensively for Welker in the Tampa game. He never caught a ball. In pre season action in 3 games he was 6/60. In far more limited action in 2 games Branch was 4/70. Branch will likely be available because he doesn't want to finish anywhere else. According to Bedard last night there are multiple teams interested in Gaffney. Problem is his quad won't be rehabbed sufficiently for a workout for another few weeks. He isn't limited to returning here. If Lloyd or Welker goes down, they better be able to run the ball.
  15. bagwell368

    bagwell368 Third String But Playing on Special Teams

    Does anyone think we have 4 TE's?

    We have 2 - fells and shiancoe.

    That gives us the best 4 WR's in football.
  16. Froob

    Froob Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    #32 Jersey

    Did slater line up at wide out even once the whole preseason? Basically leaves them with 3 recievers if they don't make a move thats just asking for trouble. Don't want another 06 or 09.
  17. patfanken

    patfanken Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract

    #91 Jersey

    First a general rule of thumb - If your best player at their position goes down your production is likely to be damaged. The way we worry about what will happen if so and so goes down is pathetic. We make it sound like no other team has any problems. Go ask a Lions fan who's backing up Calvin Johnson and see if he's excited by the prospect. :rolleyes:

    That being said here is what I think our back up receivers will work should something happen.

    1. If Welker goes down, Edelman replaces him'

    2. If Lloyd goes down, there are a couple of choices. The best physical fit would be Hernandez. Remember Lloyd is a deep threat, but not a speed threat. IIRC Hernandez is actually faster. In the short run, Hernandez would give us a receiver with the kind of size, quick feet, body control, and speed, to run all the routes that Lloyd will run.

    However I think that in the long run the threat Hernandez presents by being moved all over the field in his current position is greater than the threat he would present on the outside as the Z. So if that were the case I'd send Edelman out there. He's faster but not as strong and a different kind of receiver. We'd have to run different patterns in that case.
    There 's also the Gaffney option, but Gaffney isn't Lloyd either.

    3. If Gronk goes down, the world as we know know it will soon cease to exist. But until that time Fells would back him up, He would be a capable replacement, but a step down in both blocking and receiving.

    4. If Hernandez goes down Shiancoe would replace him. Also a capable replacement but a step down from Hernandez as a receiver

    The problem with injuries is that you are never as good as you would be be with the "starter". But that doesn't mean that you can't get the job done with a combination of everyone who is left. Remember if one of the big 4 goes down, Brady will still have more elite targets than most NFL teams. It will be up to the coaches and Brady to elevate the replacement to put him into the the best situations possible to get the most out of his skills.

  18. BSR

    BSR In the Starting Line-Up

    Who was our depth last year after Welker and Branch? Shockingly, the WR position is still an improved from last year, although I do agree the depth is non existent. However, I still believe one of Gaffney or Branch end up back on this team.
  19. Sean Pa Patriot

    Sean Pa Patriot Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    #12 Jersey

    I understand gaffney is hurt... but your going to tell me shancioe... or ever how you spell it, made the team from the tub, while gaffney who is know quality was cut.. ????
  20. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member Supporter

    #75 Jersey

    Answer: Secret weapon Marcus Forston!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page