Welcome to PatsFans.com

Semi-OT: Is Mike Reiss headed to the dark side?

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Bring Back Antowain!, Sep 23, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bring Back Antowain!

    Bring Back Antowain! Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    As Patriots fans, we know what bad reporting can be like. I don't want to mention too many names, but there's Breer, Borges, Felger, Curran, Gasper, even SMY to some extent now, etc., who continually seem dead set against the Patriots way, looking for any way possible to criticize the team, with a continually negative outlook.

    Mike Reiss was one of the few I really enjoyed reading. Ever since he went to ESPN Boston, he hasn't really been the same, but he wasn't the Breer-type. However, over the last few weeks, and maybe it's just me, Reiss has been getting especially pessimistic and overly critical, and may be headed down the path to the Boston media "dark side." I think it started with the Leigh Bodden injury. Since then, it seems that everything that happens to the Patriots is "end of the world."

    I hope he's just in a funk and can get out of it, but I'm a little bit worried. In the mean time, my favorite too have become Christopher Price, Ian Rapoport and blogs such as Pats Pulpit.

    It's kind of ironic that just over two years after the walk-through fiasco that my favorite reporter in the region is probably Rapoport. After that it's probably the blog Pats Pulpit. It's not "real" media, but it provides timely, level-headed, and in depth analysis. Besides, what is "real" media these days?

    Where are you guys turning to for your Patriots' fix? Do you think Mike Reiss is turning to the "dark side"? Thoughts?
  2. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    17,168
    Likes Received:
    241
    Ratings:
    +807 / 12 / -5

    #12 Jersey

    I don't have any problem with what Reiss has written since he went over to ESPNBoston. If his writing has seemed negative over that brief span of time, it's because there's been more bad than good in the interim. He doesn't seem to be any more or less critical than he's always been.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  3. Armchair Quarterback

    Armchair Quarterback Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,696
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ratings:
    +143 / 4 / -3

    #37 Jersey

    It's just you
  4. aluminum seats

    aluminum seats Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,423
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +16 / 0 / -0

    It might help to provide some examples, or at least one.

    Could be you don't want level-headed analysis as much as cheerleading.
  5. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico On the Roster

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    9,191
    Likes Received:
    121
    Ratings:
    +289 / 0 / -2

    No Jersey Selected

    He's pretty candid and has some critical comments in today's chat, but nothing chippy or snide, IMO. Almost a relief to see since he can sometimes come across as a borderline homer. He's still the best on the Pats beat.

    Chat: Chat with Mike Reiss - SportsNation - ESPN Boston
  6. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,314
    Likes Received:
    527
    Ratings:
    +1,673 / 70 / -75

    Disable Jersey

    Reporting on Patriots problems and "bad reporting" are not necessarily the same thing.
  7. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,028
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +43 / 4 / -3

    I think Mike is objective and good, but honestly I find that he tends to parrot what is being said already by fans and such.

    I don't see much that is against the grain or truly enlightening.
  8. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,349
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +130 / 4 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    Is Mike Reiss headed to the dark side?...Maybe, i heard they have Cookies over there. ...All it takes for someone to be a Pats hater is to say something mildly critical. All of a sudden your no good any longer.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  9. alphilip77

    alphilip77 Rookie

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Maybe, like Brady, Reiss isn't dialed in.....:D
  10. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    What do you expect him to do...act as if this team has no flaws and lie?

    I swear some of you are probably prancing around the house with your hands covering your ears saying aloud " I don't want to hear the Patriots are not perfect,I don't want to hear that - na-na-na-na-na"
  11. mcsully

    mcsully Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,042
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +4 / 3 / -0

    Reiss is objective and of late, seems to be benefitting with his conversations with Bruschi.
  12. tajapandu

    tajapandu Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    this [10char]
  13. Bring Back Antowain!

    Bring Back Antowain! Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Maybe I wasn't clear.

    I still like Reiss' reporting, but I've noticed more pessimism from him lately. It could be nothing, but I don't want to see him become another Gasper.

    Obviously, good journalists need to be critical. It could be that ESPN sort of restricted his opinion his first months there. He sort of just reported.

    Still, I just haven't enjoyed Reiss as much lately. Of course, all of his work on the play-time charts, sub-packages, and offensive package numbers have been great.

    Apparently I'm in the minority. Maybe I just need to finally own up to that fact that the days when the Patriots could do no wrong as an organization are over
    :bricks:
  14. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,897
    Likes Received:
    129
    Ratings:
    +339 / 22 / -2

    Other than this site, Reiss is the only reporter I regularly read. I agree tha he does report specualtion from elsewhere; to me that's a plus. I like his analysis and willingness to state his position even when unpopular.

    As an example, I can recall his many blogs regarding the expectation that McKenzie was not going to make the 53. After a lot of pressure and convincing, he ended up with McKenzie on his final roster. However, the 3-week discussion was a good one, no matter how many hundred posts here called the idea of McKenzie not making the 53 to be ridiculous.

    I suspect that Reiss is too conservative for many here. For example, he saw Faulk go to IR. His thought was that Morris will be the 3rd down back. While that may be obvious to my way of thinking, others would rather see him ask for Woodhead to be our 3rd down back, since we signed him to replace Faulk.
  15. R_T26

    R_T26 Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,428
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Omg between the patriot commercials thread and this one its too funny on this board sometimes.

    People its called journalism... This isnt china.
  16. PATRIOTSFANINPA

    PATRIOTSFANINPA Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    15,720
    Likes Received:
    12
    Ratings:
    +12 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    People who have read Reiss over the years did not see much negativity in his columns over that period because the team was actually overall pretty darn good and not much bad or negative stuff to write about.

    This team is as weak as it as been in the Belichick tenure here so any idiot can realize a weak team will get more negative exposure than a team that is pretty stout.

    Take away the bandwagoners who started to become fans in 2002 and the rest of us remember the days in the newspapers and media bashing and ridiculing everything Sullivan,Kiam and this team did or shall we say didn't do,and this was for years at a time,Reiss is nothing we haven't seen before.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  17. reflexblue

    reflexblue PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Messages:
    17,349
    Likes Received:
    47
    Ratings:
    +130 / 4 / -0

    #91 Jersey

    So all you want to hear is Sunshine and Lolly pops Huh. Doesn't matter what the truth maybe, just as long as reporters tell you what you want to hear.
  18. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    17,168
    Likes Received:
    241
    Ratings:
    +807 / 12 / -5

    #12 Jersey

    I think this thread shows the opposite: after all, literally nobody has agreed with the OP. Most of us can tell the difference between agenda-based reporting and objective reporting of negative situations. Even the OP is usually pretty reasonable; probably just had a knee-jerk moment.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
  19. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,453
    Likes Received:
    635
    Ratings:
    +1,839 / 31 / -48

    No Jersey Selected

    In the last 20 or so games, there's been more negative things than positive things to report on, to be honest. Reiss is still light years better than some of the other trash in the Boston media.
  20. Ian

    Ian Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2000
    Messages:
    5,250
    Likes Received:
    179
    Ratings:
    +248 / 2 / -1

    #17 Jersey

    I actually commend him for asking some of the questions, and being honest about his thoughts. He's a guy who you actually don't mind if he's critical, because he takes the time to explain why he feels that way and what he feels they've been doing wrong. It makes for a good read and actually makes you think.

    It's the opposite of the people who say "get rid of [insert player name here]" and have no plan for after the fact. So I don't mind that he's critical, and give him credit for being analytical about some of the issues they're obviously having. Some of the reports coming out today from that site are backed up with hard numbers. Let's face it, they're obviously not playing great football right now - and unfortunately it's happening on the side of the football that you wouldn't have expected to see it from.

    We all knew the defense was going to have their share of growing pains. I'm O.K. with that, because as long as they get better and learn from them that's all that matters. However, I didn't think they'd be as bad offensively as they were last weekend, especially in the second half. So they've got some things they need to fix, and as I said give Reiss credit for being able to talk about them in an objective manner.
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2010
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>