I agree that we dont NEED to take a RB early, but if BPA is a RB... hell, we've got space on the roster at RB and another strong RB will make the team better. And we dont have any really overwhelming needs, anyway. Drafting another DE is appealing, but with Deaderick, Pryor and Brace already in the fold, plus Ty Warren returning, we have youth, size and depth at the position. OL is appealing, but we could find a prospect in any round, after watching Dante turn Neal, Connolly and Koppen into elite players.
I disagree with the sentiment to focus exclusively on late round RB prospects. In every round, there's going to be a value decision to make, based on the candidates and roster needs. If you like a player but feel that RB is a high risk position to draft early, then downgrade your rating, don't take them off the board!
For example, I love Mark Ingram for this team, for many reasons already stated. I also agree with the sentiment that he has high mileage, that's he's surrounded by talent, he's over-hyped thanks to the Heisman, and that our need at RB isn't only moderate given the emergence of Woodhead and BJGE.
Some prognosticators have Ingram as a top-10 or top-5 pick. And, if so, then I'm afraid I will have to pass even though I'm a fan. But if he drops to #32... well at that point, I know that he would add more value to the roster than whatever DE or OLB or OL is available. My value point for Ingram is in the late teens/early twenties. If he lasts that long, that's where I try to move to take him.