I am going to have to state the incredibly obvious here. The Patriots were not in Super Bowl 55. Perhaps some here didn't notice that? That was my choice.
I am going to have to state the incredibly obvious here. The Patriots were not in Super Bowl 55. Perhaps some here didn't notice that? That was my choice.
I am going to have to state the incredibly obvious here. The Patriots were not in Super Bowl 55. Perhaps some here didn't notice that? That was my choice.
Apparently we have the right to strip any title that was won by an ex patriot on another team and transfer it here. Hey we’re Super Bowl 41 champions now!
This whole thing is wack. The entire point of these hypotheticals is to trade one you won for you one lost. For example trading Super Bowl 39 for 42 is a no brainer. If you’re an old fan maybe you’d like to trade one of the 6 in for a victory in Super Bowl 20 instead. Completely valid. But trading one in for a team that has yet to even make a playoff spot isn’t how this works.
A win this year with a Rookie QB, has never been done before. This would be a first. It would cement Bill as the GOAT Coach forever. He would win COTY. He would prove he can win w/o that other guy. That's more important than 6 SBs combined. Bill >>>>>>> That other guy
This is like those stupid meme’s on FB.
If you don’t respond Amen, you will have bad faith the rest of your life
Everyone of our 6 SB’s were special and would not minimize any of them
And yes even responding this way WE WILL WIN MORE
That's an example of why I love the Italian language. It makes fifty-five sound like a song title. I wish I could speak it.
Questo è un esempio del perché amo la lingua italiana. Fa sembrare cinquantacinque come il titolo di una canzone. Vorrei poterlo parlare
So the backup long snapper had as much to do with winning the superbowl as brady. Got it. Dude we know you hate Brady and dont think he is ****, I just dont understand why you come over to this forum. You need to learn a statement that was made by a very smart man. Most valuable player does not mean only valuable player. When you figure that out someday maybe you can get off Brady for awhile.
So the backup long snapper had as much to do with winning the superbowl as brady. Got it. Dude we know you hate Brady and dont think he is ****, I just dont understand why you come over to this forum. You need to learn a statement that was made by a very smart man. Most valuable player does not mean only valuable player. When you figure that out someday maybe you can get off Brady for awhile.
Sorry dimwit, this was on the main board when I posted that and it got moved to your sub-forum. The original question was non-sensical since those super bowls were a combined effort of all 53 players and the coaching staff. The super bowls don't belong to any one man.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.