- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,324
- Reaction score
- 105,274
"We suspended him for four games despite lacking any actual evidence that he did something. We've now seen the error of our ways and understand that there's no credible reason to believe he did anything wrong. We're therefore reducing his suspension to 2 games, because a two game suspension for literally no reason makes sense and reasonable people should totally be on board with that".
Sheer madness that fuels the egos. Or is it the other way around?