primetime
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Messages
- 13,627
- Reaction score
- 15,375
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What rookies do we have as primary targets?There's a difference between having a rookie as depth in case your vets get injured and having rookies as your primary targets.
Winning a Super Bowl in one-game playoffs is largely a factor of luck, so "a team built for the regular season" is probably a good thing, since a bye week in the playoffs means you only have to win 3 largely random games and home field does have a small but significant effect on chances of victory.
One game is a stupid argument. No player, unit or facet of a team is good every single game.A physical team can run when they want to run, when the defense knows it's coming and still can't stop it. That's what physical means, you can impose your will on your opponent.
How did running work against the Broncos?
What rookies do we have as primary targets?
Gronk, Edelman, Amendola, LaFell, Dobson.
One game is a stupid argument. No player, unit or facet of a team is good every single game.
Your argument can be extended to everything sucks because you can find a game where it didn't work
Please tell me where I said that, if you can't than you shouldn't lump me in with other posters. The defense failed but the offense also failed to put up points in the playoffs, as they have for years.
Like it or not, they're a finesse team built for the regular reason.
No you aren't. You are talking stupid things like 'imposing your will' and saying our running game was ineffective because it didn't dominate every game, which no one ever does.No, I'm just talking about stalling in the playoffs, which is the new norm.
Let me get this straight. You are proposing that Bill Belichick builds his team for regular season success and chooses to not be concerned about winning in the post season? Seriously?
Last year we had rookies as primary targets.
Anyway, adding a talented rookie this year would not have been a bad thing, despite your trying to twist his words to make your strawman argument.
No you aren't. You are talking stupid things like 'imposing your will' and saying our running game was ineffective because it didn't dominate every game, which no one ever does.
Please, stop trying to twist words. I never said he's unconcerned, you can have all the concern in the world but it doesn't matter if you don't do a good job of addressing that concern, two different things.
We aren't talking about last year we are talking about this year.
An argument that we were stupid to rely on rookies last year so I don't understand why we didn't draft more rookies this year is dumb.
If you seriously think it's luck I have a bridge to sell you.
Seattle is not lucky, they're damned good.
More word twisting from you. There's a difference between dominating and being effective, at the very least you want to be effective, which our running game wasn't, it completely evaporated against the Broncos.
No you said it was built for the regular season. That means exactly what I said, which is why I asked you to clarify, and now it sounds like you are just whining that we don't win the SB every year so trying to sound slick in the way you state it.
Yes, and that's why your initial argument was stupid, adding a rookie to the 14 roster wouldn't have been the same as recreating the 13 roster, there's a difference.
It's one thing to not win the SB, it's another to have your regular season powerhouse offense slow down to a crawl.
I'm not twisting your words, you are abandoning them when I question them.
These were your words:
A physical team can run when they want to run, when the defense knows it's coming and still can't stop it. That's what physical means, you can impose your will on your opponent.
This just illustrates your lack of understanding of the difference between regular season and playoff football, and your selective memory of the facts.