SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'd think a team like the Jets would be kicking themselves for not jumping on this kid.
The Jets cap structure is set up so they cannot afford decent depth. No way they pay a 54th player to sit on pup or IR all year in order to be better next year.I don't know if its been asked and answered already in this thread, but how did some other more TE needy team not claim him before the Pats? I'd think a team like the Jets would be kicking themselves for not jumping on this kid.
That depends on the sport. The unwritten rules in hockey and baseball are very important. In football, not so much...
Hernandez is good as a TE because he is quick and fast for a TE. As a WR he would be slow, negating a lot of his talent.
I recall a story going around a few years ago about how BB called Minnesota coach Childress and personally and requested they don't put a claim into Garrett Mills.. Childress scoff'd and took him.. (google it, some stories about it)
The Jets cap structure is set up so they cannot afford decent depth. No way they pay a 54th player to sit on pup or IR all year in order to be better next year.
If todays depth doesn't matter to you, nexts year isn't even a consideration.
I think it really comes down to the Giants figuring nobody would pony up 500k for Ballard not to play. They out-thinkified themselves.
Q: When you release a guy and hope to put him on your practice squad and he gets claimed by another team is that a frustration for you?
BB: No. I mean, anytime you release a player I think you have a pretty good expectation that he's not going to be here. If you want him then you keep him on the roster. Once you've put him out there then you can expect to lose him. The practice squad – we've lost guys before that haven't been claimed and then they sign with another practice squad team – or sign with another team and go to their practice squad, and we've done that. We've signed guys that have been released by other teams. We did it this year. Maybe somebody else wanted them on their practice squad, but they're on our practice squad. There're guys that we would have put on our practice squad that went to other teams on their practice squad. So, once you release the player, I think you expect them to be released. If you get them back, you get them back, but if you don't, you don't. I just don't think you can release a player and expect to keep the player. If you do that's pretty – it's nice if it happens if that's what you want, but there's got to be a good probability that that isn't going to happen. It's certainly not anything you can count on; it's not anything that we ever count on, I can tell you that. Once they're on the wire then 31 other teams – if anybody wants him, he's there's. Unless he's vested – that's a little different situation, but we weren't talking about a lot of players in that category – not on the practice squad.
Even better is that I was reading a thread on JI yesterday where someone mentioned that Ballard had been waived and was wondering if the Rats should put in a claim. No one else picked up on that thought at all.
So now fast forward to today, and we find out that the Pats, who probably have the top TE group in the NFL, are the ONLY team to put in a claim on Ballard, while lesser teams, like the Rats, just sat their on their mangy, flea-bitten haunches, gnawing on moldy cheese, and allowing the far superior Pats to get even more superior.
Imagine the gnashing of little rodent teeth now in the fetid swamps of New Jersey.
To be fair to the jets, they are only 4 mill under the cap at this time, they still have to put the PS together and need a contingency fund to either sign a august cut or sign an in season pick up.to spend 15% of the space on a guy that will not play is a stretch.
BB's press conference from last year in which he was asked about all the Pats players who were cut and signed by other teams, including guys like Will Yeatman and Lee Smith:
Bill Belichick Press Conference Transcript
False, Hernandez had a better 40 time than Welker or Lloyd.
Welker 4.61 WES WELKER 40 TIME
Lloyd 4.62 Brandon Lloyd - WR - Illinois - 2003 NFL Combine Results
Hernandez 4.58 Source: Aaron Hernandez visiting the Lions | National Football Post
You were saying?
I'm pretty sure that the only source for those articles is the renowned ass clown Brad Childress who I believe is currently unemployed. (Maybe there is an IT department looking for a decent intern).
Why would the Pats only call the Vikings and ask that when 30 other teams could have taken him? It makes very little sense. And regardless, Mills was a nothing that they were trying to get to the PS. Dozens of those guys get snatched up every year at cut-down time.
The hilarity is that the Giants felt that they just had to have that 90th player and figured nobody would pay a guy half a million to rehab this year. And here I thought Kraft was cheap.
I understand the point and I'm sure the Giants know the same exact thing. They tried to get cute and that's no doubt why Coughlin is so pissed.
C'mon Andy. Pony up and admit you misspoke.I think even you can understand that Wr skills, and 'speed' are defined much more widely than how fast you ran a 40 once.
C'mon Andy. Pony up and admit you misspoke.
As for your secondary comment about speed, I tend to agree. Some players who lack explosive pace can still play fast. That's the benefit of skill, body control, precision routes and mental aptitude.
As for the Ballard acquisition. The Patriots capitalized on an ill-advised move by an opponent. The Patriots have strengthened their own roster and weakened a rival within the boundaries of legislation. There should be no quarrel from anyone. It was a legitimate move.
Of course not. You don't enjoy your own hypocrisy being pointed out where others are happy to simply admit they made a mistake or didn't research their position before making a comment.My point had nothing to do with 40 times, and I stand by it.
Of course not. You don't enjoy your own hypocrisy being pointed out where others are happy to simply admit they made a mistake or didn't research their position before making a comment.
Same old Andy.
Hernandez is good as a TE because he is quick and fast for a TE. As a WR he would be slow, negating a lot of his talent.
I think even you can understand that Wr skills, and 'speed' are defined much more widely than how fast you ran a 40 once.
Thank you for allowing me to have an opinion. I read your position and have duly noted the key points in bold.Think what you wish.
I know that I know what I meant, and it would appear from your comments that you do not.
You are, however, entitled to your opinion, divisive or not.