- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 9,601
- Reaction score
- 1,959
Buster Skrine tried to trip him as a last resort and Boyce still made him look foolish.
Boyce reminds me of one of DeSean Jackson of the Eagles in that he is so elusive.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Buster Skrine tried to trip him as a last resort and Boyce still made him look foolish.
I don't think that was a trip attempt as much as him losing his jock strap.
EDIT: I can't remember, but was a flag thrown on that play?
Woodhead's been more dependable. Vereen's more explosive and less expensive.
Sorry Deus i can not agree on the "been more dependable".
Vereen has been Brady's go to on big 3rd downs every game he has played.
IMO Vereen is a cheaper more explosive and just as dependable target. That is taking nothing away from Woodhead who i think is a great football player.
Boyce was one thing I was very positive about in the game!
Looked good, and great in space!
Boyce - as well as Edelman & Vereen - had an inexcusable 1st-quarter drop, and he really
should've caught that pass in the EZ anyway.
I feel that while he doesn't have the bust potential that Aaron Dropson still has, let's not
fit him for a bust yet, either.
Are you really calling him Aaron dropson after the few big weeks he had before injuring his foot? Not sure how you can say he has bust potential he's already shown he belongs in the nfl
Excited about Boyce. Think he has the chance to be a player here. What an offense we could have been looking at had everyone been healthy.
Love that Boyce is getting a chance though. I think, in the next 2 years...if Gronk comes back healthy...our offense is going to be through the roof if these guys develop.
Dobson, Thompkins, Boyce all look like players who can be difference makers. Depth is essential and we have it.
Definitely going to need to draft/sign a couple OLinemen though. Would love to see us draft a capable TE high.
He's just another troll that needs to be eradicated from this place.
9 yards though
I always thought the general consensus that woodhead was the better running back of the two.
Vereen's in his 3rd season, but he's only played 23 games. Woodhead's played 44 games in that same time period. Woodhead's had the higher ypa in 1 season, they've been even in 1 season, and Vereen's is higher this season. In addition, Woody's had more receptions each year, and he's scored more than twice as many TDs. He's averaged more receptions per game and more carries per game.
Even this season...
Vereen's averaged under 4 yards per carry in 3 games out of the 5 (60%) games he's had carries this season, and averaged over 7 ypc in the other 2.
Woodhead's averaged under 4 yards per carry in 5 of the 12 (42%). Vereen shines in the receptions department, no question, with higher ypc and a higher number per game, but woodhead has him beat in the run game and when it comes to durability.
It may change moving forward but, to this point. Woodhead's been the more dependable player.
Sorry Deus are you talking dependable as in "doesn't get injured" or dependable as in "we need to getthis 3rd down" or :we need a play" dependable?
Because if it's the latter i disagree and i don't understand what YPC e.t.c matter because the stat that would matter would be thrown to on 3rd down and the percentage converted. Also percentage of balls thrown to on third down total.
That to me is what dependable means. If you are saying that Vereen has been injured more that's fair enough. But having a larger RPC or YPC is not what i consider dependable.
BTW, Woodhead's rushing 1st down % this year is higher than Vereen's rushing 1st down % this year, so even that metric favors the little man.
Not by much though.
Woodhead 25%
Vereen 23.6%
Receiving
Woodhead 41.5%
Vereen 52.5%