SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Caspir said:"Umm" everyone with a brain cell to spare knew that none of them would slide that low because the teams who needed QB's were in the 10-15 range. Young and Leinart were definite top 10 picks, leaving Cutler, who had multiple teams looking at him. There was no "run" on QBs, but if it makes you feel better then go ahead and assume so.
TB12 said:if Bunkley were to fall alot, would the Pats pick him? Viewed by most as a top 10 pick, and has incredible strength
JoeSixPat said:Ummm - you can insult and protest all you want newbie... but just like Rodgers last year many so-called experts thought that one of the big three could slide.
If Denver and AZ, two teams that didn't have pressing QB needs, hadn't taken them when Buffalo, NY, and Oakland - three teams with QB needs who most projected to go for the big three had passed, they would have slid
Clearly you've got no idea what you are talking about... give it up
PatDaPatriot said:Bunkley doesn't really fit the Pats' scheme...
I think the Eagles will surprise and take Nick Mangold...