The 2004 team was great. In 2004. That team right now would be worse than the team that they have now and there are no two ways around it.
Cabrera hit .257 with a .309OBP last season. The Angels tried to give him away for nothing but every team passed on him becasue he is vastly overpayed, and although he may be a great guy, he is still a bad offensive hitter with a good glove. Better than Gonzalez, but not substantially.
And Lowe was TERRIBLE in 2004. Maybe he could pitch well under pressure, but he couldn't pitch well the entire regular season. A couple good starts in the post season doesn't overshadow what he did the rest of the year.
Mueller had knee trouble his entire career. Nothing actually happened to him to get injured this season, his bad knees just caught up with him. He'd have had the same problem here too. If he got a big contract with Boston and he got injured in the first few months and never played again would you be ok with that? Or would you complain about how the FO was stupid to have resigned a guy with knee trouble and they should have known better? People don't seem fine when Beckett, Clement, Crisp or anyone else comes in and struggles, but you'd be fine with Mueller being out and injured for a good part of his contract just because he was on the 2004 team?
Do you realize how moronic that sounds? You'd rather have a guy who hasn't played since early May over Lowell just becasue he was good in the past?