Re: McGinest on NFLN , talks a bit about spygate also
Thanks for posting that. It was a great interview. Willie made a great point, a point that I've made but people rarely give it much credit. The Camera can't play the game for you on the field. I keep going back to that 2000 season. WE won 5 games that year. How come these so called signals didn't help our overall record? Very simple answer. OUR TEAM SUCKED. I went back and watched those highlights or lowlights. It was very clear that our 2000 Patriots lacked TALENT. I don't care how much film you have, if a team doesn't have the players to compete on the field, they are not going to win many games. JMO.
Re: McGinest on NFLN , talks a bit about spygate also
I just think I should add, the next year we were pretty damn good. I'm guessing it takes time to digest the relationships between signals, down and distance, formations, and motion. All of a sudden, our sub-par corners played like superstars for the next several years.
I just think I should add, the next year we were pretty damn good. I'm guessing it takes time to digest the relationships between signals, down and distance, formations, and motion. All of a sudden, our sub-par corners played like superstars for the next several years.
I just think I should add, the next year we were pretty damn good. I'm guessing it takes time to digest the relationships between signals, down and distance, formations, and motion. All of a sudden, our sub-par corners played like superstars for the next several years.
Moron. I guess we needed the first two games for further digestion too, right - then, just coincidently, Brady starts right when we understand the signals.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.