- Joined
- Jun 12, 2006
- Messages
- 5,393
- Reaction score
- 616
1) Have we as a franchise been too picky when it comes to picking a linebacker?
2) Are we just bad at drafting linebackers?
3) I get kind of sick of hearing the "we need big linebackers that fit our system"
4) We need speed and become an attacking defense.
1) Yes
2) No, we just don't do it. Claridge was the highest drafted LB in the BB era.
3) I am a little sick but who can argue with the results, the aged veterans played very well and the defense as a whole played exceptional through the playoffs. They just could not make a crucial stop on the last drive of the season.
4) Maybe, wasn't the defense top 5 in PPG and second in sacks? That being said I like the idea of a faster LB as a 3rd down specialist, someone who can be used to cover a RB or TE and blitz. The Ravens have used Barnes in this fashion, he is too small to play against the run but in passing situations he can use his speed (4.5) to really get up field against the QB. I also think that the lack of speed at LB puts pressure on the Safeties who have to cheat to the inside to help out the aged.
Anyway looking at how the value is shaking out I would look for BPA in round 1, WR in round 2, LB / CB in rounds 3 & 4.