SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm criticizing a pick, a pick. We all know not every pick works out but that doesn't mean every pick was a smart decision, there's a difference between the two.
The funny thing is that I can actually admit when I'm wrong, and I've been wrong before, but the BB Kool-Aid drinkers can't ever admit that a pick was garbage, even long after it's failed, I just hear people talk about when he's been right.
Well, your definition of not "squandering resources" and being the "unquestioned master of navigating a draft board up or down" evidently includes this formula:
62 = 90 + 163 > 67 = 87 + 120
Sorry, but I reserve the right to "question" this "unquestioned mastery".
But I believe Belichick likes to stir the pot. I think he enjoyed seeing The Hair (Mel Kiper) rendered speechless. I know Ron Zook from my own sources thinks very highly of the player selected.
I'll be back later with Charles Rogers, but right now i have to find a DL to take Seymour's spot, because the Patriots blew it when they passed on Terrell and Koren Robinson, both on their way to Canton, unlike Seymour who was a complete bust.
New England Patriots: They needed to get more weapons for Drew Bledsoe, but instead they went for Richard Seymour at defensive tackle, another position where they needed help.
This one isn't nearly as good as Ron Borges' version......
"Ki-Jana (Carter) could be the next Bo Jackson"
There's the RB...................
The only thing that mattered is where the Patriots had him rated on thier board. If when their pick came up they had him as the #1 player available when thier pick came up, you take him.
You don't say well Mel and Todd think he will be available in the 5th round so we will take the #2 player available caause Mel thinks he is a good value?
You either go with your board or why have a board at all?