so has this thread really devolved into asking someone to prove a negative? one guy simply asks for anything other than "i say so" pointing to Drew being a quitter, and all he gets in response is "prove he isn't a quitter."
that isn't how it works. you don't prove negatives. it isn't up to me to prove that sunsets aren't caused by aliens, the burden of proof is on you to prove that they are.
c'mon, all this guy is asking for something that points to drew as being a quitter. I post this because i'm actually curious as to the origin of this belief. and no, nancy drew by itself is proof of nothing.