JoeSixPat
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 10,671
- Reaction score
- 1,043
It's actually quite fun to show all these other fans just how ignorant they are:
They are "debating" whether taping signals is legal or not, apparently not realizing that it always has been and still is today.
As the Dolphins illustrated when they were "caught" in 2006, post game analysis of signals can indeed pay off. And if there's an advantage and it's legal, its safe to say every team does it.
After all, using a Quarterback is legal and gives an advantage in the game as well, and we don't see too many teams playing without a QB (or at least guys who call themselves QBs)
No, they don't realize that what they've been so uptight about since last September is the location of the videotaping - not the videotaping itself.
That's slightly less scandalous than the original outrage that signals were being stolen (also legal) only to be replaced by the notion that stolen signals were being videotaped (legal as well) and really takes the wind out of their sails.
They are "debating" whether taping signals is legal or not, apparently not realizing that it always has been and still is today.
As the Dolphins illustrated when they were "caught" in 2006, post game analysis of signals can indeed pay off. And if there's an advantage and it's legal, its safe to say every team does it.
After all, using a Quarterback is legal and gives an advantage in the game as well, and we don't see too many teams playing without a QB (or at least guys who call themselves QBs)
No, they don't realize that what they've been so uptight about since last September is the location of the videotaping - not the videotaping itself.
That's slightly less scandalous than the original outrage that signals were being stolen (also legal) only to be replaced by the notion that stolen signals were being videotaped (legal as well) and really takes the wind out of their sails.