- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,617
- Reaction score
- 16,395
You can say Connor Barwin if your primary concern is replacing Thomas in 2011. That is amjor concern and a reasonable use of a top draft pick. Do you expect him to be a major contributer in 2009 or even a starter quality player in 2010?
However, if you want more than Thomas-Woods-BantaCain at OLB for 2009, I would suggest considering other names in place of Barwin, or in addition to Barwin. Or you could hope that Crable develops very quickly.
However, if you want more than Thomas-Woods-BantaCain at OLB for 2009, I would suggest considering other names in place of Barwin, or in addition to Barwin. Or you could hope that Crable develops very quickly.
We didn't have the talent in 2008 to rush the QB. Our olbs were either too long in the tooth (Vrabel) or had to make up for the deficiency of others (Thomas). That's why the sack numbers were down. Don't blame the system. And it's not sack numbers alone that we should look at, it's overall QB pressures. Sacks are just one indicator. The pressure wasn't there in 2008. Let's look at the numbers over the years.
2008 31 sacks 14th 11-5, Missed playoffs
2007 47 sacks 2nd 16-0, Lost Superbowl
2006 44 sacks 5th 12-4, Lost AFC title game to Colts
2005 33 sacks 23rd 10-6, Lost to Denver in playoffs
2004 45 sacks 3rd Superbowl Champions
2003 41 sacks 6th Superbowl Champions
2002 34 sacks 20th Missed Playoffs
2001 41 sacks 13th Superbowl Champions
As you can see, there appears to be a direct correlation to how good the New England pass rush is, to how well they do in the playoffs. Now I'm not saying that the sacks are the only thing to look at, I think that the number of QB pressures will be higher in those successful years as well. But if you look at the numbers, improving the passrush has got to be priority #1 for the Pats in the upcoming draft. Can we say Connor Barwin?
Sack stats courtesy of NFL.com:
NFL Stats: by Team Category