i will never make that mistake again... There are a lot of reasons. One is the Colts are the one team that can keep up with the Patriots if there's a shootout. Doubt it? Well, they scored 32 second-half points against them in the AFC Championship Game victory last January. The Colts didn't punt. Did that have anything to do with Brady not having good receivers? Didn't think so. The Colts will attack the Patriots linebackers, guys who don't have great speed. Joseph Addai will catch a lot of passes. They will also try to get Rodney Harrison, an aging safety who doesn't run that well anymore, matched up in coverage a bunch. Dallas Clark will be huge in this game. So could Anthony Gonzalez. The Colts played the Patriots in that title game without a legitimate third receiver. Gonzalez can be that guy. The Colts defense is also better than a year ago. They're faster. Their corners are better. But to beat the Patriots you have to outscore the Patriots. You won't stop them. That's how the Colts can win. They can outscore them. How about 44-41? For an offensive guy like me, I'd take it. http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10429746 owww, u must be kiding me...rit? Prisco says that the D giving up 32 points in the half had NOTHING to do with the Offense? r u king me????? he should have known better... my points? if the pats O can get first downs which was plausible with better recievers, they keep the ball away from manning...HELLO??? make sense prisco???? also, the longer the pats O is on the field, the longer their D is OFF it, RESTING...u can call me einstein whenever ur ready prisco... and lets not forget this one...if the pats had better recievers, maybe they would have been able to score another TD...LETTING THE PATS WIN...ok prisco..SO...u can go hide in a hole now...u embarassed urself enough honestly? and then he points out how important gonzalez can be? r u serius? i dont know why i bother any more...but are sports writers really that dumb?