The author is an idiot. How do I know? Look at this one:
The write up for this picture of Kentucky's VOLLEYBALL team's NIT victory?
Team: Kentucky Wildcats
Location: Memorial Coliseum, Lexington, Ky.
Honors: The men's basketball team winning the 1976 NIT
Lameness quotient: Moderate. The Wildcats had the good sense not to hang said banner in Rupp Arena, where the men's basketball team usually plays its home games. Nevertheless, the winningest program in NCAA hoops history shouldn't need to display a 1976 NIT banner anywhere, any more than Magic Johnson needs a trophy case for participating in MTV's Rock 'N' Jock basketball games.
Fun fact(s): Kentucky was playing a 2009 NIT game in Memorial Coliseum because of a Rupp Arena scheduling conflict with a high school basketball tournament. In other words: Kentucky's athletic department does not leave open dates in anticipation of the NIT. (Which is probably why the man in the foreground is no longer coaching the Wildcats.)
i think espn must embrace their own lameness. otherwise, how do you explain their content. they are idiots on so many levels. with their sexual harassment, east coast bias(code:blind ny love) spin city mentality, distortions, misleading of facts and zero journalistic integrity, they are a hot mess.
I also agree with RussFrancis, probably the whole reason this list was started was because someone at BSPN realized they hadn't ripped on the Pats for a while.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.