- Joined
- Sep 22, 2008
- Messages
- 4,329
- Reaction score
- 2,486
Logan Ryan was a liability covering Adams. He has been a liability for many games. All the QBs target him.
Who are you picking on? Revis, Browner, or Ryan? Lol guy, get it together.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Logan Ryan was a liability covering Adams. He has been a liability for many games. All the QBs target him.
Two words, mobile quarterback.lol We were outgained in the air and on the ground.We were also outcoached with the play calling on both side, Packers was much better.We need chandler jones back,Rodgers had several minutes to throw in his comfy pocket. We looked like a finesse team, just like the packers.The good news is only the chargers matters now, i wanna see more toughness and it starts in San Diego.
17 for 85, terrible play selection. Blount went 10 for 58.This, Green Bay dominated, especially in the 1st half. Nice 2nd half adjustment defensively, but the offense didn't adjust in the 2nd half, for the highest scoring offense to only score 7 points is was a big reason why we lost. The better team won, period. Time of possession, yardage, and final score were all in the Packers favor. Now if we out gained them 500 yards to 200 yards, and we lost on a missed field goal, then I'd agree the better team lost.
Green Bay deserved that win - they made their third down conversions (easilly) and the Patriots did not - 'nuff said
But losing by 6 to GB at Lambeau Field FEELS like a victory to me
Let's put it this way - if that game were on neutral ground for the SB I feel like the Pats would have won
You are better than this.given the game he played and that he was still on the field on the last meaningful play of the game and failed to defend the first down catch, tells me that the pats were never all that intent on winning this game
I mean they try to win every game, but they played the game not to show much and they succeeded
the icing on the cake was brady's f-bomb dance on the sideline......looked a little scripted to me
Getting tossed to the ground for a third down conversion early will screw up an undersized physical corner...I'm both confused and disappointed in regards to Alfonzo Dennard.
Correct
I think our D did a good job *as good as you can hope for* keeping the packers out of the endzone.. But that is the only area they did a good job with. The other really important area they did absolutely terrible in was 3rd down. They just couldn't get that one big stop we needed. That is something I was counting on going into this game. Our defense being better than green bays. They let me down a little bit.
Of course, no one gets a free pass in a close loss. There is always something that someone could have done at some time to make a difference. Granted.Yes, but the defense was on the field for 36 minutes in part because they couldn't get GB off the field on 3rd down. The offense having some short drives had something to do with it, too, but the defense doesn't completely get a free pass.
The D did a great job...let's not forget that the other guys were pretty darn good . This wasn't Luck or Stafford or Manning in the cold...it was Rodgers and a slew of weapons on their home turf.
The only measure of a D that matters is points allowed, IMO. Two TD's to Rodgers, Nelson and Cobb is an accomplishment under any circumstances; when you're on the field for nearly 2/3 of the game, I'll still call it remarkable.
The Pats and Packers had the same number of drives (nine). Green Bay had a (relatively) balanced attack with 38 passes and 29 rushes; the Pats threw 35 times and ran 18 times, against the #30 of 32 run D's in the League. The D was gassed.
As the old saying goes, we'll just have to agree to disagree.I disagree, when you let the other team completely control the game and the clock and you constantly fail to get off of 3rd down all day, you didn't do a great job. Regardless of who it was, I don't think they did a great job at all.
Getting tossed to the ground for a third down conversion early will screw up an undersized physical corner...
I disagree, when you let the other team completely control the game and the clock and you constantly fail to get off of 3rd down all day, you didn't do a great job. Regardless of who it was, I don't think they did a great job at all.
As the old saying goes, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Now, we're "On to San Diego."
Two words, mobile quarterback.
That said, McD must have been concussed, bolden over gray? How many carries for vereen? He did the right thing against Indy, but I'm starting to think that was BB firmly planting a shoe in a dark place. Why not hammer the rock with Blount and gray against the 30th ranked run d? Pass all day and Tim Wright watches most of the game from the sidelines. Dobson goes down and Tyms was where? The offensive game plan was a throwback to KC.
It's almost as if BB was steering the ship, got through the majority of iceburgs, and turned the wheel over to McDaniels. What did McDaniels do? Well, that genius fool turned the wheel half a spin towards the run game, unfortunately he threw the prop (personnel decisions) half a click in reverse, effectively b-lining straight into the GB iceberg.
There is no reason the offense should have looked as mediocre as they did. Bolden?! There's a reason that juiced up hack only sees the field on ST's. FFS guy.
According to ESPN, bolden and vereen ran three times each. That doesn't sound bad until you consider we only ran seventeen times. Was it be or was every vereen run a damn foolish play call? I'd hazard a guess that each vereen rush coincided with a drive ending in a punt. But what do I know. Hell, if bolden broke a rush for 12 yards, would blount have taken it the distance? Who is more explosive? Hell, grays four yard carry seemed to be a solid, move some bodies and hit the collapsed hole, chicken salad out of chicken **** variety. But obviously mcdouche had to air it out, and make sure "his guys" (amendola, figures autocorrect wanted mendoza, and hooman) were in for the failed crunch time. Plus he threw out a clearly hobbled Edes on third and fourth down. Plenty of time to take it to their horrible run defense Josh, but keep up the passing game with a hurt Edes, LaFell coming if a shoulder injury, and okay right into a dline that has been teeing off on the pass all game.
Hell, the run game just wasn't cutting it. We only rushed for 85 yards on seventeen carries, and that includes Vereen's 3 for six. SMFH
Who are you picking on? Revis, Browner, or Ryan?
I would feel so much better about a rematch if we had any semblance of a third wide receiver. I don't care who, just somebody. People say Amendola is Edelman's insurance but he did nothing even when Edelman was clearly hurting. Outside of special teams, it is like he isn't even on the team. No reverses, bubble screens, or anything much outside of blocking. I think Tyms could be our number three but at this point I would even settle for Slater.
Hasn't he been fighting a nagging injury? If memory serves, he had shoulder surgery in the offseason. Rehab may be tough in a prison cell...While that's a fair point, I think it's gone much further than that when you take into account the fact that he had been a healthy scratch for several weeks with Malcolm Butler leaping him in the depth chart. It's actually something we may end up seeing again.
If it's a confidence thing as you suggest, then it seemed to have happened a long time ago--much earlier in the season.