- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 11,532
- Reaction score
- 10,040
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.if it were up to me id:
Re-Sign:
TBC
Bodden
Faulk
Gostkowiski
Mankins
Neal Is 32. Injured way too much. Is contemplating retirement.
Wilfork
Watson Watson is going to get paid a LOT of money by someone since he's probably the best UFA TE available..
Sign:
Karlos Dansby ILB
Matt Turk P There are better punters than Turk available. Jon Ryan. Sam Koch. Michael Koenen.
Jermaine Phillips FS Where did you see that Jermaine Phillips was a free agent? I checked 2 different sites (KFFL and Footballsfuture and neither had him listed)
Trade:
Maroney to Cleveland for a third rounder (#71) Why would Cleveland do this when they have Jerome Harrison to be their primary RB, Jamal Lewis to be their reserve RB, and they could bring in a guy like Chester Taylor as well?
Thomas and Chung to Baltimore for McGahee - So you give away Chung, who is the future starting SS for the Pats???? You do realize that McGahee is 29 this year.
Draft:
#22 Carlos Dunlap DE
#42 Sergio Kindle OLB
#47 Mardy Gilyard WR/KR
#52 Bradon Ghee CB
#71 Vladimir Ducasse OG
Cut or Trade:
Taylor - Why?
Springs Why?
Sanders Why trade away the guy who was named by Belichick as being the difference maker in the 2nd half of the year for the secondary?
Starting Lineup:
It would take a lot of wheeling and dealing but still in the relm of possibility
........
People seem to have this NEED to make changes. Change for the sake of change isn't a good thing. Change should be made at the places where you absolutely need to make a change. If an area can be improved upon, great, do so. But thought needs to be put into the change. Not just from one side of the equation. For instance, why would Baltimore WANT Adalius Thomas back?
....
+1 for Dilbert.DaBruinz - you didn't realize that this thread creator is in school - and most likely studing for a degree in Management - Dilbert school of BS.
It happens all the time in management. Change just for the sake of change. In the company I work for, we have had something like 4 different time registration systems in the last 6 years. Each new version (new product each changeover) is supposidly better than the last. Doesn't matter that even though (supposidly) a better system - noone here can find the appropriate (everchanging) time codes to register time on the different customer accounts. So mass confusion and wasted time and energy learning a new system every 1 1/2 years.
I applaud the sheer effort put into the changes made by the poster- but it seems instead of 'team building' - its more like 'team : mix it all up, throw it against the wall and lets see what sticks'. In this 2010 Pats edition, I favor re-signing most of our own, a solid draft (should be possible due to our # of high picks & deep draft) and some FINE TUNING by signing a very few FA's.