http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3259486
From the article:
--Walsh does NOT have a confidentiality agreement with the Patriots or anything else that would prevent his cooperation, though I assume that does not include stolen property.
--Specter wants to talk to BB and Ernie Adams, but says he has been stonewalled. The Pats attorney told Specter that "it's a league matter," basically that Specter has no business investigating this.
--The JETS have also denied permission for their people to speak to Specter. I'm sure they don't want their people under oath about their taping practices. I liked that one, though I suspect it will not be reported.
--Damon Huard would not talk to Specter, who called him, but Huard did not believe it was actually Specter.
--Specter seemed to take offense that there were "notes." Why would there not be notes?
From the article:
--Walsh does NOT have a confidentiality agreement with the Patriots or anything else that would prevent his cooperation, though I assume that does not include stolen property.
--Specter wants to talk to BB and Ernie Adams, but says he has been stonewalled. The Pats attorney told Specter that "it's a league matter," basically that Specter has no business investigating this.
--The JETS have also denied permission for their people to speak to Specter. I'm sure they don't want their people under oath about their taping practices. I liked that one, though I suspect it will not be reported.
--Damon Huard would not talk to Specter, who called him, but Huard did not believe it was actually Specter.
--Specter seemed to take offense that there were "notes." Why would there not be notes?