SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It's odd that Felger feels he has to point out that the Pats lead the league in 4th quarter scoring, because in fact the Pats biggest scoring quarter has been the 2nd quarter, so the 4th quarter thing is as much incidental as anything else.
This is a question posed in the article:
"What’s the difference between that fourth-down situation and the one last month against the Redskins, when the Pats went for it on fourth-and-1 from the Redskins’ 7-yard line in the fourth quarter, leading 45-0?"
The difference is that Gostkowski needed reps in real game situations. He struggle for a good part of last year.
No, I think if someone were trying to get back from a 30-point deficit, they would be going for 2-point conversions. Therefore it is possible that four TDs will be enough, not five.By scoring thirty you are making it a four score game, five for the opponent to take the lead
No, I think if someone were trying to get back from a 30-point deficit, they would be going for 2-point conversions. Therefore it is possible that four TDs will be enough, not five.
It's odd that Felger feels he has to point out that the Pats lead the league in 4th quarter scoring, because in fact the Pats biggest scoring quarter has been the 2nd quarter, so the 4th quarter thing is as much incidental as anything else.
I've been told Felcher doesn't lie or make up things.
If we lead more in other quarters, he chooses to leave that out and implies we score more in the fourth, isn't that really a lie?
If you look at the context of the games and the points scored the only game you can really make a case for running it up is the Redskins.