-Are you aware that the Pats were harpooned by the media all season and still destroyed their opponents? I'm sure one man's article had no bearing on how they performed. A good argument could be made for Specter because of the office he holds. But to blame Tomase directly for the Super Bowl loss is ridiculous and makes you look like you don't have to stones to just admit that we got outplayed. Excuses are the lamest thing you can do, especially when your team goes 18-0 and loses the Super Bowl. You keep making excuses, I'll live in reality. We got outplayed whether or not a senator was in Brady's head. The sooner you admit that, the less depressed you'll be about that game.
-I never said it wasn't a big deal. I DID say that his article wasn't to blame for the loss. The Giants front four were.
-I've been a die-hard fan of the Pats since 1993. By the way, I was 7 years old at that time. So yeah, call me casual, I guess. Whatever makes you feel better, buddy. And are the personal attacks really necessary? Last time I checked, I haven't attacked you and have debated you so far.
-Well I guess I posted in every Spygate/Specter thread saying that Specter is a joke for no good reason then, eh? BRILLIANT logic you're displaying here, Nostradamus.
-I'm actively persuing my business degree at the University of North Florida. One of the benefits of being 21. Would you like me to scan my transcripts and Photobucket them on here for you?
-You have a point here.
-And you're deducting this from what? Because I've never been exposed to PUBLIC criticism? So far, you've done nothing but fling
pathetic personal attacks at me instead of debating me. With this post, you have made absolutely ZERO points whatsoever and are now wasting my time. But hey, I'm at work and have nothing but time to waste. Besides, I'm always happy to educate the mentally ******ed. By the way, you dodged my question so I'll ask it again: WHAT POSITION IN OFFICE HAVE YOU HELD WHERE YOU WERE EXPOSED TO PUBLIC CRITICISM? YOU SEEM TO BE A REAL EXPERT AT IT
-So I guess having to present a report on the state of the national economy in front of 600 students couldn't be considered present oneself in the public sphere? What is your IQ?
Nailing 1 out of 4 isn't bad. I'll be the first to admit I'm lazy. The rest though, with that logic, you should probably stay out of this thread. I mean, your thought process and logic is so horrible that (even if I did originally take your opinion seriously) I can not longer listen to your opinion on anything. But here, let me do what you did and take stabs at you based on your posts around here.
I have already deduced from your various other pathetic posts that you are: (yes, we use a colon there) (1) highly overweight, (2) based on your sudden temper, I'd wager to bet that you have not so much as smelled someone of the opposite (or maybe in your case, the same) sex in years, (3) have no friends whatsoever, (4) have no personal life where you can actually go out and vent your frustrations. DID I HIT TEH MAKR??/
Please get back to me when you are actually capable of debate, or grow a few brain cells. Whichever one comes first... or comes at all.