- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 5,511
- Reaction score
- 2,299
Check that - Teams will be provided with TWO transition tags and one franchise tag.
Incorrect.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/05/25/mmqb/2.html
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Check that - Teams will be provided with TWO transition tags and one franchise tag.
Besides the fact that I think at that point we'll be ready to move on from Seymour and perhaps even Vrabel if need be (it hurts to say), our owner isn't afraid to fork over cash to put out a winning team. If anything, aren't we more likely to retain these players in an uncapped scenario? They like playing here, they like winning, and our owner has the money to pay them.
To me I think this is moot for 2 reasons.
1 Its at least 3 yrs till serious talk...
2 This will never come to be, because the nfl will not kill the golden goose, its going to take some time, but there will not be no salary cap, and no lockout..
As that red neck says- get r done, or they will get r done
To me I think this is moot for 2 reasons.
1 Its at least 3 yrs till serious talk...
2 This will never come to be, because the nfl will not kill the golden goose, its going to take some time, but there will not be no salary cap, and no lockout..
As that red neck says- get r done, or they will get r done
See the PFT article about the logistics of the uncapped year. The conditions the CBA places on the uncapped year will severely limit player movement. There will not be free flowing money that year. Many high profile free agents may have to take hometown discounts.