ESPN, Patriots create an obvious conflict of interest | ProFootballTalk.com
funny to imagine espn and pats collaborating....
funny to imagine espn and pats collaborating....
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm still trying to figure out how it is a conflict of interest.... Its not like KSG is going to OWN part of ESPNBoston.
This is just Florio being an idiot, imho..
Sounds like sour grapes to me...
Yeah. It's even funnier to read the comments following the article and talk about ESPN bias TOWARDS the Pats, and one moron who says Goodell does favors for the Pats. I guess taking away our first round pick was Goodell's way of helping Kraft save money by not having to pay another player?ESPN, Patriots create an obvious conflict of interest | ProFootballTalk.com
funny to imagine espn and pats collaborating....
Yeah. It's even funnier to read the comments following the article and talk about ESPN bias TOWARDS the Pats, and one moron who says Goodell does favors for the Pats. I guess taking away our first round pick was Goodell's way of helping Kraft save money by not having to pay another player?
Look guys, say what you will but there is clearly a conflict of sorts here. The author mentions the latest Brady thing and how its not mentioned anywhere. Tom Brady is news, if he had stammered after a few drinks its news, if he takes off his knee brace it news. So the fact that this is not being given huge press by ESPN is strange. This is what they live off of, National Enquirer type stuff.
If you read between the lines, what the guy is saying here is that there might have been a deal struck where EspnBoston.com got a very nice deal here from Kraft's company.
Didn't ESPN also NOT get into the whole Big Ben suit that's going on? It's possible it's just policy.
Kraft can't own a NESN, so at least partner with the broadcasters....this why he is rich and getting richer.
Question to the board....How is Patriots Place doing?
JSn is correct. Espn has a policy of not commenting on pending civil suits; that's why they didn't comment on the allegations made against Roethlisberger. There's a lot that I don't like about their content but at least they got this right. The more news there is about these type of stories, the more people are going to be encouraged to try and extort money from those that are in the public eye.Look guys, say what you will but there is clearly a conflict of sorts here. The author mentions the latest Brady thing and how its not mentioned anywhere. Tom Brady is news, if he had stammered after a few drinks its news, if he takes off his knee brace it news. So the fact that this is not being given huge press by ESPN is strange. This is what they live off of, National Enquirer type stuff.
If you read between the lines, what the guy is saying here is that there might have been a deal struck where EspnBoston.com got a very nice deal here from Kraft's company.
Pretty well these days. Been there recently?Kraft can't own a NESN, so at least partner with the broadcasters....this why he is rich and getting richer.
Question to the board....How is Patriots Place doing?