You guys are a bunch of homer morons if your comparing records this year. You guys have one of the easiest divisions in football only one worse is AFC west and you played those junk teams. Of course your going to go 13-3. Once you played a good team, Giants, Steelers, you lost. If you played in NFC east you would of gone 8-8 with that defense.
I feel like it's the movie groundhog day going over this 'who have you beaten' crap yet again, but I'll play along in regards to your points.
Pats record vs NFCE: 3-1
Giants record vs NFCE: 3-3
Collective record of AFCE: 33-31
Collective record of NFCE: 30-34
Giants defense: allowed 400 points
Pats defense: allowed 342 points
Please tell me more about this alternate universe where 9-7 is better than 13-3, 3-3 is better than 3-1, 30-34 is better than 33-31, and giving up 400 points is better than giving up 342 points.
As for the weak schedule and the 'who have you beaten' angle the Patriots were the only team that finished with a winning record that the Giants beat in the regular season, so you fail on that point too - even though it has been proven to be a completely meaningless stat. It's ironic that you bring that up though because if anybody should be aware of how meaningless that is, it should be a Giants fan.
Don't get me wrong, I think the Giants are a very good team and this game could easily go either way. It's just that the reasons you give to make your case for why the Giants could or will win are extremely weak, and to accuse others that think otherwise of being "homer morons" is completely hypocritical. I don't want to get into name calling but frankly the "homer moron" label would much more aptly be applied to you at this point.
