Case 1: Possibility of a team overcoming a 21 point deficit with 10 minutes
Case 2: Possibility of a team overcoming a 28 point deficit with 14 minutes
Case 3: Possibility of a team overcoming a 14 point deficit with 2 minutes and the team that's ahead is in the red zone
Case 1: BB felt the probability was high enough that you should keep trying to score
Case 2: BB felt the probability was essentially nil, so no reason to try to score until/unless it becomes Case 1:
Case 3: Wade Phillips felt the asnwer was yes. Hence Wade called a timeout. BB also felt that Dallas could win the game given a turnover & onside/quick-score. Field goal = chance for turnover. Running up the middle with the 4th string running back = not trying to score. If dallas can't stop a 4th string rb who they know is going to run up the middle; well I dont know how anyone can blame the patriots on that one.
I really don't know how it can get any simpler than this. If the other team has a greater than 1% chance of willing, BB will keep trying to score. If they have less than a 1% chance, BB will try to kill the clock (if the other team lets him).
And you can't have it both ways. You can't keep trying to win, and expect the other team to let you.
The only reason you rest your starters is for their own good, not to help the other team's feelings.
Honestly, the problem isn't that the Pats are running up the score. The problem is that their so good that other team's can't stop them; & thus this situation comes up every week.
Case 2: Possibility of a team overcoming a 28 point deficit with 14 minutes
Case 3: Possibility of a team overcoming a 14 point deficit with 2 minutes and the team that's ahead is in the red zone
Case 1: BB felt the probability was high enough that you should keep trying to score
Case 2: BB felt the probability was essentially nil, so no reason to try to score until/unless it becomes Case 1:
Case 3: Wade Phillips felt the asnwer was yes. Hence Wade called a timeout. BB also felt that Dallas could win the game given a turnover & onside/quick-score. Field goal = chance for turnover. Running up the middle with the 4th string running back = not trying to score. If dallas can't stop a 4th string rb who they know is going to run up the middle; well I dont know how anyone can blame the patriots on that one.
I really don't know how it can get any simpler than this. If the other team has a greater than 1% chance of willing, BB will keep trying to score. If they have less than a 1% chance, BB will try to kill the clock (if the other team lets him).
And you can't have it both ways. You can't keep trying to win, and expect the other team to let you.
The only reason you rest your starters is for their own good, not to help the other team's feelings.
Honestly, the problem isn't that the Pats are running up the score. The problem is that their so good that other team's can't stop them; & thus this situation comes up every week.
Last edited: