- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 16,482
- Reaction score
- 1,343
I thought I was hearing things when after the game,Deion said that if there is a player on this team that is JUST as important as Brady it would be Welker and losing him to injury would be just as bad as losing Brady
I thought that statement was a bit exaggerating at the very least.
Sure Welker is our guy who has been crucial in tons of 3rd down plays and has been the reason why we won several games that could hve been losses like the Dallas game but losing him is as big as losing Brady?
I think if Welker was injured now,I think we could have put Troy in or have Faulk help out with the missing Wes but Brady missing to replace him with Cassell? - Thats like replacing Caviar with Tuna Fish at a banquet.
I thought that statement was a bit exaggerating at the very least.
Sure Welker is our guy who has been crucial in tons of 3rd down plays and has been the reason why we won several games that could hve been losses like the Dallas game but losing him is as big as losing Brady?
I think if Welker was injured now,I think we could have put Troy in or have Faulk help out with the missing Wes but Brady missing to replace him with Cassell? - Thats like replacing Caviar with Tuna Fish at a banquet.