heavyde050
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Messages
- 4,810
- Reaction score
- 1,294
The officiating helped them get 7I don't know that I'd call 17-7 exactly close, especially when we handed them the 7.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
The officiating helped them get 7I don't know that I'd call 17-7 exactly close, especially when we handed them the 7.
There's no simple test they could do. They could see if it's leaking and if it is see if it's been punctured.
But that's it. If it's low in pressure what does that show? Maybe it got spiked or had pressure leak out during a tackle. Or maybe someone let air out. How would you know?
All the media said is they're investigating. Anything more as to "suspects" is conjecture.Just about every media outlet reported as such from the original sources, which at the very least has some partial credibility, because it was later confirmed to be true. I said I don't have an official story that says it either way. That's why I asked. The media is reporting it one way, you are saying they are investigating it another way.
I just asked for some official info, one way or another. If you have it great, if you don't, then I don't think we should imply that there are no suspects either, since that's how it originally was reported, and thus far we have not had anyone come out and defend that.
No I think I was pretty clear. If we know the ball is deflated, by any and for any means, we are morally culpable. Come on now, I'm not interested in twisting words.
A lot of media rehashed the Kravitz story. The league stated they are investigating the ball(s) because they always do. There is no credible source claiming that the investigation involves accusation that the Patriots are culpable in any way, or that the NFL suspects them in any way.Just about every media outlet reported as such from the original sources, which at the very least has some partial credibility, because it was later confirmed to be true. I said I don't have an official story that says it either way. That's why I asked. The media is reporting it one way, you are saying they are investigating it another way.
There is no credible report that there are suspects. End of story.I just asked for some official info, one way or another. If you have it great, if you don't, then I don't think we should imply that there are no suspects either, since that's how it originally was reported, and thus far we have not had anyone come out and defend that.
Well no not really you'd have to know how warm the air was when it was pumped up. If it was pumped up outside then it wouldn't deflate due to temperature change because there wouldn't be one.I said if it was deflated due to temperature, which would clear us, there is a test you can perform.
I said if it was deflated due to temperature, which would clear us, there is a test you can perform.
If its the case that the refs investigate the balls because they always do then BKraft should go DTrump and sue that little POS Kravitz.A lot of media rehashed the Kravitz story. The league stated they are investigating the ball(s) because they always do. There is no credible source claiming that the investigation involves accusation that the Patriots are culpable in any way, or that the NFL suspects them in any way.
There is no credible report that there are suspects. End of story.
Hey, wasn't that a great game yesterday? Isn't it great to be going back to the SB?
That's all he said though, they're "invrstigating".If its the case that the refs investigate the balls because they always do then BKraft should go DTrump and sue that little POS Kravitz.
How would they know the ball is 12.48 psi instead of 12.5?
Even if it were flat the refs are handling the ball every play. Isn't it part of their job to notice if it's flat?
All the media said is they're investigating. Anything more as to "suspects" is conjecture.
Are you saying teams report players for using PEDs/steroids?That's why I said if we knew. So it would have to be noticeable. I also think the NFL believes it's part of our job to notice that.
Cheating by omission is still cheating, if true. If we know a player is on steroids, we know we're cheating. Yeah it's the NFL's job to test, but we're still cheating if we know and condone it or omit to report it. As all teams so frequently do.
A lot of media rehashed the Kravitz story. The league stated they are investigating the ball(s) because they always do. There is no credible source claiming that the investigation involves accusation that the Patriots are culpable in any way, or that the NFL suspects them in any way.
There is no credible report that there are suspects. End of story.
Hey, wasn't that a great game yesterday? Isn't it great to be going back to the SB?
You'll be hearing about this for many years just like the now revised history of NE taping practices (which that asshat from IND who first reported this also said when asked why he tweeted it out).Lol this is actually a story??
5. I'd interview Anderson, Paganelli, the side-judge, the ball boy handling the balls on the side-line and the ball boy handing the storage bag which holds the balls that are out of the rotation.
Someone who takes steroids is doing an action which is directly against the rules.That's why I said if we knew. So it would have to be noticeable. I also think the NFL believes it's part of our job to notice that.
Cheating by omission is still cheating, if true. If we know a player is on steroids, we know we're cheating. Yeah it's the NFL's job to test, but we're still cheating if we know and condone it or omit to report it. As all teams so frequently do.