sb1
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 34,831
- Reaction score
- 39,182
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah, surprised me too....I suppose one of his long catches was still considered a ‘win’ for the pats because he was inbounds on the last drive.Cooks had 120 yards receiving..... okay after checking nfl.com he actually did. Would never have guessed that/
Always felt like his primary goal was to draw flags and not fight for the ball. That flag he drew on Gilmore was classic Cooks, turn back into the defender and get yourself tangled up with him to make it look like you're being mugged. Something very soccer-y about him.
We traded Cooks because of his price tag not because he couldn’t hack it. Edelman could have used a little more help yesterday. Obviously the risk of trading him turned out well as we were able to win without him.
He got bouye in last years AFCC on something similar. I’m glad we never got to see him and Flacco paired up together.
Funny you bring this up on the Rams forum I read things like If they had Joe Flacco or Ryan Tannenhill they are winning the Superbowl.
Some of the fans have jumped from the Goff bandwagon.
We could have used him yesterday. We have no real WRs outside Edelman and it showed last night.
His QB being crap had nothing to do with him.
good chunk of that on last desperation driveCooks had 120 yards receiving..... okay after checking nfl.com he actually did. Would never have guessed that/
Flacco always made me nervous just because of this knack of his of getting garbage DPIs on bombs. We just don’t know how the refs will call it. I thought the refs were great last night letting both teams play.
Cooks had 120 yards receiving..... okay after checking nfl.com he actually did. Would never have guessed that/