- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Messages
- 9,609
- Reaction score
- 10,390
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Vinovich, Walt Coleman, Walt Anderson to name a few...Seriously! Whenever a ref for a game is announced, all people do is complain. I'm being serious: can someone name a ref that they believe is actually decent and would rather have out there?
The best spin I can put on this is that he's better than Corrente or Boger. But not by much, this is nearly worst case scenario. Of the four remaining teams, I think Denver and Carolina are feeling better about their prospects after hearing this news, and Arizona and the Pats are probably feeling a bit worse.
When Vinovich was announced last year, the response here was positive across the board. Which makes sense, since he has not been involved in a memorable bad call against the Patriots in a game that the Patriots lost.
I think the argument could be made, that he is capable of being influenced to pick up flags on blatant penalties he's witnessed. And now Blandino is in his ear.What is there to discuss? No one suggests he incorrectly measured the balls do they? So, what he made one bad call/no-call against the Pats? Couldn't that be said about every single referee???
Outside of an obvious screw job (which I really don't think the NFL wants in the SUPER BOWL - something broadcast across the globe) the refs won't matter as long as the players do their jobs.
Obvious being the key word, of course.
Seriously! Whenever a ref for a game is announced, all people do is complain. I'm being serious: can someone name a ref that they believe is actually decent and would rather have out there?
Can you elaborate on this? Do you think that Blakeman is biased toward the Panthers and Broncos, or do you think the penalties his crew under/overcalls would disproportionately impact certain teams? Also, keep in mind that SB crews are all star crews, so the latter factor would be hard to qualify.
Fixed. Let's not kid ourselves that we are evaluating the refs at a level deeper than a very cursory review of our (Patriot-biased) memory banks. ALL referees (including The Great Vinovich) have bad calls on their resumes (even if against the Patriots, you may just not remember them because they didn't decide the game). They are all capable of making others both for and against the Patriots. Now, there are some that are just consistently awful and almost universally criticized by all fan bases (Jeff Triplette comes to mind), although I would hope that these are not selected for the Super Bowl (AFAIK, Triplette never was).
What is there to discuss? No one suggests he incorrectly measured the balls do they? So, what he made one bad call/no-call against the Pats? Couldn't that be said about every single referee???
Dont care . Its just important to make the SB first .Report: Clete Blakeman to call Super Bowl 50
Discuss. In my opinion, this is better than Tony Corrente, one of the other possibilities. But of course, Blakeman is well known for his role as the alternate ref who took some of the PSI measurements when we won the AFC Championship Game last year. He is also the referee who picked up the flag that nullified Luke Kuechley's hold/PI on Gronk in the game in Carolina a couple of years ago.
Outside of an obvious screw job (which I really don't think the NFL wants in the SUPER BOWL - something broadcast across the globe) the refs won't matter as long as the players do their jobs.
Obvious being the key word, of course.
I would rather have Vinovich, but Bleakman did a game of our this year already, and if IIRC, we were pretty happy with the results (relatively speaking). I can't remember the exact game, so if anyone can help on that.
.